Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:35:01.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antennal Morphology In The Developing Polyphenics Of Liphaptis Erysimi (kalt.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Pushpinder J. Rup  and
Parvinder K. Kalra
Pushpinder J. Rup
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar — 143005, India
Parvinder K. Kalra
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar — 143005, India
Get access

Abstract

The present study revealed that the ratio of antennal to body length in Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) increased from 0.55: 1.00 in the first instar to 0.75: 1.00 in the adult alatae as compared to apterae, where the ratio stayed almost the same. The antenna showed specific growth regions i.e. first and fourth annuli, where the increase in size was more compared to other parts. Five morphologically distinct types of sensilla were recorded i.e. sensilla companiform. sensilla trichodea with enlarged spatulate tips, sensilla trichodea with tapering uniporous tips, plate organs and coeloconic pegs. The distribution pattern of these sensilla showed that the number of sensilla trichodea increased during the development, the increase was more in alatae compared to apterae. The secondary sensoria were restricted to adult alatae only, but could be seen under the cuticle in fourth instar alatae. In addition, the variation in the surface sculpturing in the form of scale-like projections were also observed on the antenna.

Résumé

L'étude à present a révélé que la proportion de l'antenne à la longeur du corps en Liphaphis erysimi (Kalt.) a augmenté de 0.55:1.00 dans le premier instar à 0.75–1.00 dans l'adulte alatae en comparaison avec apterae, où la propodrtion a reste le mème. L'antenne a montré des regions spécifique de développement ou augmentation en taille a été comparé plus qu àux autres sections. Cinq distinct types morphologique de sensilla ont été registré; Sensilla companiform, sensilla trichodea avec les bouts spatulé agrandi; sensilla trichodea avec les bouts uniporous en tuseau, les orgues plat et les coeloconic chevillers. La modele de distribution de ces sensilla a montré que les numéros de sensilla trichodea a augmenté pendant le developpement l'augmentation a été plus dans l'alatae en comparison avec les apterae. Le sensoria secondaire a été limite aux adultes alatae seulement, mais on peut les voir sovs le épiderme, dans le quatrième instar alatae. En plus, le variation dans le surface sculpture comme les projections echelles ont éte auni obscive sur l'antenne.

Keywords

Lipaphis erysimiantennasensillapolyphenismdevelopment
Type
Research Artilces
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 389 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, W. J. and Carde, R. T. (1984) Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, A. R. and Uharton, G. W. (1971) The use of glycerol, KC1 in scanning microscopy of acri. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64, 528–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, A. K. and Anderson, M. (1982) An electrophysiological study of olfaction in the aphid Nasonovia ribis-nigri (Mosley) (Homoptera). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 32, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, A. K., Dunn, J. A. and Anderson, M. (1979) Ultrastructure of the antennal sensilla of aphids. I. Coeloconic and placoid sensilla. Cell Tiss. Res. 203, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, R. F., Bernays, E. A. and Simpson, S. (1981) Attraction and repulsion of aphid, Cavariella aegopodii (Homoptera) by plant odours. J. Chem. Ecol. 7, 881–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. and Booth, C. O. (1951) Host alternation in Aphis fabae Scop. (Homoptera: Aphidae). I. Feeding preferences and fecundity in relation to age and kind of leaves. Ann. Appl. Biol. 38, 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D. (1975) Responses of male aphids to the female sex pheromone in Megoura viciae Buckton (Homoptera: Aphidinae). J. Entomol. 50, 43–64.Google Scholar
Nault, L. R., Edwards, L. J. and Styer, W. E. (1973) Aphid alarm pheromones: Secretion and reception. Environ. Entomol. 2, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T. L. (1974) Pheromone perception. In Pheromones (Edited by Birch, M.C.), pp. 35–57, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. (1970) Studies on Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphidinae). I. Laboratory studies on olfactometric responses to the winter host Prunus padus L. Lantbrukshogsk. Ann. 36, 381–399.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, G. F., Frazier, J. L., Castell, A. E. M. and Coons, L. B. (1978) Antennal sensilla of seventeen aphid species (Homoptera: Aphidinae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 7, 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H., Sekhon, S. S. and Lees, A. D. (1964) The sense organs on the antennal flagellum of aphids (Homoptera) with special reference to the plate organs. Q. J. Micr. Sci. 105, 21–29.Google Scholar
Singh, O. P., andRawat, R. R. (1983) Seasonal incidence and toxicological studies on Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae ) and its parasite Aphidius sp. in Madhya Pradesh, India. Pranikee 4, 259–267.Google Scholar
Wang, C. H. and Huber, F. (1976) Morphological study of aphid antennae of Aphis nerri Boyer (Homoptera: Aphididae). I. Flagellar sensilla. Bull. Inst. Zool Acad. Sinica 15, 47–56.Google Scholar