Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:37:31.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low profile dual band-stop super wideband printed monopole antenna with polarization diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2019

Murli Manohar ,
Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum  and
Anup Kumar Gogoi
Murli Manohar*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, IIITImphal 795 002, Manipur, India
Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, IITGuwahati 781039, Assam, India
Anup Kumar Gogoi
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, IITGuwahati 781039, Assam, India
*
Author for correspondence: Murli Manohar E-mail: murli@iiitmanipur.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A low profile super-wideband polarization diversity printed monopole antenna with dual band-notched characteristics is presented the first time. The designed antenna comprises two arched shaped radiating elements with two triangular tapered microstrip feed lines (TTMFL) and two arched shaped partial ground planes, which covers an enormously wide impedance bandwidth (BW) from 1.2 to 25 GHz (ratio BW of 20.8:3) for reflection coefficient |S11| < −10 dB. To ensure the high port isolation (better than − 30 dB) between two feeding ports over the whole bands, two analogous antennas have been kept perpendicular to each other at a distance of 1 mm. In addition, the dual band-notched performance in wireless local area network (5–6 GHz) and X-band (7.2–8.5 GHz) is generated by employing a pair of open-circuited stubs (L-shaped stub and horizontal stub) to the TTMFL. Envelop correlation coefficient has been computed to study the polarization diversity performance. Finally, the proposed antenna was fabricated and tested successfully. Measured results indicate that the proposed antenna is an appropriate candidate for the polarization diversity applications. The proposed antenna has a compact size of 40 × 70 × 0.787 mm3, high isolation, and occupies a small space compared with the existing antennas.

Keywords

Dual band-notched antennapolarization diversitysuper wideband (SWB) antennatapered monopole antenna
Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 11 , Special Issue 7: MIKON 2018 / EuMW 2018 (Part II) , September 2019 , pp. 694 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Foschini, G and Gans, MJ (1998) On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas. Wireless Personal Communications 6, 311–335.Google Scholar
2.Vaughan, RG and Andersen, JB (1987) Antenna diversity in mobile communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 36, 147–172.Google Scholar
3.Wang, A, Zhenghe, F and Luk, KM (2009) Pattern and polarization diversity antenna with high isolation for portable wireless devices. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 8, 209–211.Google Scholar
4.Chen, ZN and See, TSP (2009) Diversity and its applications in ultrawideband antennas, Proccedings of IEEE International Workshop Antenna Technology, Santa Monica, CA, USA, March 2009pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
5.Chen FCC (2002) First report and order in the matter of revision of part 15 of the commission's rules regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems, ET-Docket, April 22,pp. 98–153.Google Scholar
6.Koohestani, M, Moreira, AA and Skrivervik, AK (2014) A novel compact CPW-fed polarization diversity ultrawideband antenna. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 563–566.Google Scholar
7.Wang, L, Xu, L, Chen, X, Yang, R, Han, L and Zhang, W (2014) A compact ultrawideband diversity antenna with high isolation. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 13, 35–38.Google Scholar
8.Adamiuk, G, Zwick, T and Wiesbeck, W (2010) Compact dual-polarized UWB-antenna embedded in a dielectric. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 52, 279–286.Google Scholar
9.Chacko, BP, Augustin, G and Denidni, TA (2013) Uniplanar slot antenna for ultrawideband polarization-diversity applications. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 88–91.Google Scholar
10.Liu, J, Esselle, KP, Hay, SG, Sun, Z and Zhong, S (2013) A compact super-wideband antenna pair with polarization diversity. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 1472–1475.Google Scholar
11.Huang, H, Liu, Y, Zhang, S and Gong, S (2014) Uniplanar differentially-driven ultrawideband polarization diversity antenna with band-notched characteristics. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 563–566.Google Scholar
12.Ramkiran, DS, Madhav, BTP, Reddy, KN, Shabbeer, S, Jain, P and Sowmya, S (2016) Coplanar wave guide fed dual band notched MIMO antenna. International Journal of Electrical and computer Engineering 6, 1732–1741.Google Scholar
13.Kang, L, Li, H, Wang, X and Shi, X (2015) Compact offset microstrip-fed MIMO antenna for band-notched UWB application. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 1754–1757.Google Scholar
14.Tripathi, S, Mohan, A and Yadav, S (2015) A compact koch fractal UWB MIMO antenna with WLAN band-rejection. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 1565–1568.Google Scholar
15.Zhang, Y, Hong, W, Yu, C, Kuai, ZQ, Don, YD and Zhou, JY (2008) Planar ultrawideband ntennas with multiple notched bands based on etched slots on the patch and/or split ring resonators on the feed line. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 3063–3068.Google Scholar
16.Dong, YD, Hong, W, Kuai, ZQ, Yu, C, Zhang, Y, Zhou, JY and Chen, JX (2008) Development of ultrawideband antenna with multiple band-notched characteristics using half mode substrate integrated waveguide cavity technology. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 2894–2902.Google Scholar
17.Mathur, SP and Sinha, AK (1988) Design of microstrip exponentially tapered lines to match helical antennas to standard coaxial transmission lines. IEE Proceedings, Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 135, 272–274.Google Scholar
18.Kumar, R and Surushe, G (2016) Design of microstrip-fed printed UWB diversity antenna with tee crossed shaped structure. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 19 946–955.Google Scholar
19.Moradikordalivand, A, Rahman, TA, Ebrahimi, S and Hakimi, S (2014) An equivalent circuit model for broadband modified rectangular microstrip-fed monopole antenna. Wireless Personal Communications 77 1363–1375.Google Scholar
20.Jaafreh, SA, Huang, Y and Xing, L (2016) Low profile and wideband planar inverted-F antenna with polarisation and pattern diversities. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 10 152–161.Google Scholar
21.Stutzman, WL and Thiele, GA (2012) Antenna theory and design, John Wiley and Sons, Technology and Engineering.Google Scholar
22.Lee, JN, Kwon, HK, Kang, BS and Lee, KC (2013) Design of an ultra-wideband antenna using a ring resonator with a notch function. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) 35, 1075–1083.Google Scholar
23.Grayaver, E (2013) Implementing Software Defined Radio, New York: Springer.Google Scholar