Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Focal quality metrics for the objective evaluation of confocal microwave images

  • Declan O'loughlin (a1), Finn Krewer (a1), Martin Glavin (a1), Edward Jones (a1) and Martin O'halloran (a1)...

Abstract

Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer detection relies on accurate knowledge of the average dielectric properties of the patient-specific breast. When accurately estimated, coherent addition will occur at the tumor site, producing a clear and sharp image thereof. Conversely, if the average dielectric properties are poorly estimated, a blurred, unfocused image will be reconstructed, potentially obscuring cancerous lesions. Several methods have been proposed to estimate the patient-specific average dielectric properties, for example, time-of-flight estimation. However, such methods are specific to the individual imaging hardware, can be susceptible to multipath propagation and assume the chosen paths are representative of the whole volume. In this paper, a novel method to estimate the patient-specific average dielectric properties is presented, based on focal quality metrics (FQMs); used historically to measure the clarity and focus of microscopic or digital photographic images. These FQMs are applied to confocal microwave breast images to assess their focus, and hence estimate the patient-specific average dielectric properties. In this way, FQMs can be used to generate the optimum microwave image of the breast. The performance and robustness of these FQMs for microwave breast imaging applications is examined in this paper and preliminary results are presented and discussed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Focal quality metrics for the objective evaluation of confocal microwave images
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Focal quality metrics for the objective evaluation of confocal microwave images
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Focal quality metrics for the objective evaluation of confocal microwave images
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author: D. O'Loughlin Email: d.oloughlin4@nuigalway.ie

References

Hide All
[1] Fear, E.C.; Bourqui, J.; Curtis, C.; Mew, D.; Docktor, B.; Romano, C.: Microwave breast imaging with a monostatic radar-based system: a study of application to patients. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 61 (5), (2013), 21192128. ISSN , . doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2255884.
[2] Porter, E.; Coates, M.; Popovic, M.: An early clinical study of time-domain microwave radar for breast health monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 63 (3), (2016), 530539. ISSN , . doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2465867.
[3] Preece, A.W.; Craddock, I.; Shere, M.; Jones, L.; Winton, H.L.: MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection. J. Med. Imag., 3 (3), (2016), 033502033502. ISSN . doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.033502.
[4] Garrett, J.D.; Fear, E.C.: Average property estimation validation with realistic breast models, in 2014 8th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), The Hague, The Netherlands, 2014, 12791280, IEEE.
[5] Garrett, J.; Fear, E.: Average dielectric property analysis of complex breast tissue with microwave transmission measurements. Sensors, 15 (1) (2015), 11991216. ISSN . doi: 10.3390/s150101199.
[6] Lavoie, B.R.; Okoniewski, M.; Fear, E.C.: Estimating the effective permittivity for reconstructing accurate microwave-radar images. PLoS ONE, 11 (9) (2016), e0160849.
[7] Lavoie, B.R.; Okoniewski, M.; Fear, E.C.: Optimizing microwave-radar imaging parameters, in 2016 17th Int. Symp. on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics (ANTEM), Montréal, Canada, 2016.
[8] Sarafianou, M. et al. : MUSIC processing for permittivity estimation in a Delay-and-Sum imaging system, in 7th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Gothenburg, Sweden, 2013, 839842.
[9] Winters, D.W.; Bond, E.J.; Van Veen, B.D.; Hagness, S.C.: Estimation of the frequency-dependent average dielectric properties of breast tissue using a time-domain inverse scattering technique. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 54 (11) (2006), 35173528. ISSN , . doi: 10.1109/TAP.2006.884296.
[10] Hagness, S.C.; Taove, A.; Bridges, J.E.: Two-dimensional FDTD analysis of a pulsed microwave confocal system for breast cancer detection: fixed-focus and antenna-array sensors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 45 (12) (1998), 14701479.
[11] Bourqui, J.; Fear, E.C.: Dielectric permittivity estimation of biological tissues using sensor array technology, in 2015 IEEE MTT-S 2015 Int. Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-BIO), Taipei, Taiwan, 2015, 125126, IEEE.
[12] Bourqui, J.; Fear, E.C.: Average breast permittivity measurements: preliminary results from current patient study, in 2016 10th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 2016, 14, IEEE.
[13] Guo, L.; Abbosh, A.M.: Optimization-based confocal microwave imaging in medical applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 63 (8) (2015), 35313539. ISSN , . doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2434394.
[14] Mohammed, B.J.; Bialkowski, K.S.; Abbosh, A.M.: Radar-based time-domain head imaging using database of effective dielectric constant. Electron. Lett., 51 (20), (2015), 15741576.
[15] Brenner, J.F.; Dew, B.S.; Horton, J.B.; King, T.; Neurath, P.W.; Selles, W.D.: An automated microscope for cytologic research a preliminary evaluation. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 24 (1) (1976), 100111.
[16] Pertuz, S.; Puig, D.; Garcia, M.A.: Analysis of focus measure operators for shape-from-focus. Pattern Recogn., 46 (5) (2013), 14151432. ISSN . doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.11.011.
[17] O'Loughlin, D.; Glavin, M., Jones, E.; O'Halloran, M.: Optimisation of confocal microwave breast images using image focal metrics, in Bioengineering in Ireland, Galway, Ireland, January 2016, 3939. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. ISBN 978-1-908358-34-9.
[18] O'Loughlin, D.; Krewer, F.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E.; O'Halloran, M.: Estimating average dielectric properties for microwave breast imaging using focal quality metrics, in 2016 10th European Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 2016, 15, IEEE.
[19] Groen, F.C.A.; Young, I.T.; Ligthart, G.A.: Comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms. Cytometry, 6 (2) (1985), 8191.
[20] Schlag, J.F.; Sanderson, A.C.; Neuman, C.P.; Wimberly, F.C.: Implementation of Automatic Focusing Algorithms for a Computer Vision System with Camera Control. Technical Report, DTIC Document, 1983.
[21] Subbarao, M.; Choi, T.-S.; Nikzad, A.: Focusing techniques. Opt. Eng., 32 (11) (1993), 28242836.
[22] Jarvis, R.A.: Focus optimization criteria for computer image-processing. Microscope, 24 (2) (1976), 163180.
[23] Linge, H.; Zimmer, H.-G.; Neuhoff, V.: Focus adjustments in linear systems. Proc. SPIE, 0375, Berlin, Germany, 1982, 4046. doi: 10.1117/12.934593.
[24] Buffington, A.; Crawford, F.S.; Pollaine, S.M.; Orth, C.D.; Muller, R.A.: Sharpening stellar images. Science, 200 (1978), 489494.
[25] Muller, R.A.; Buffington, A.: Real-time correction of atmospherically degraded telescope images through image sharpening. JOSA, 64 (9) (1974), 12001210.
[26] Chern, N.K.; Neow, P.A.; Ang, M.H. Jr.: Practical issues in pixel-based autofocusing for machine vision, in IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2001. Proc. 2001 ICRA., vol. 3, Seoul, South Korea, 2001, 27912796, IEEE.
[27] Lee, J.-H.; Kim, K.-S.; Nam, B.-D.; Lee, J.-C.; Kwon, Y.-M.; Kim, H.-G.: Implementation of a passive automatic focusing algorithm for digital still camera. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 41 (3) (1995), 449454.
[28] Baïna, J.; Dublet, J.: Automatic focus and iris control for video cameras, in 5th Int. Conf. on Image Processing and its Applications, Edinburgh, UK, 1995, 232235, IET.
[29] Helmli, F.S.; Scherer, S.: Adaptive shape from focus with an error estimation in light microscopy, in Proc. of the 2nd Int. Symp. Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, ISPA 2001, Pula, Croatia, 2001, 188193. IEEE.
[30] Krotkov, E.; Martin, J.-P.: Range from focus. in 1986 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Proc., vol. 3, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1986, 1093–1098, IEEE.
[31] Nayar, S.K.; Nakagawa, Y.: Shape from focus. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 16 (8) (1994), 824831.
[32] Huang, W.; Jing, Z.: Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion. Pattern Recognit. Lett., 28 (4) (2007), 493500. ISSN . doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.09.005.
[33] Firestone, L.; Cook, K.; Culp, K.; Talsania, N.; Preston, K.: Comparison of autofocus methods for automated microscopy. Cytometry, 12 (3) (1990), 195206.
[34] Santos, A.; Ortiz de Solórzano, C.; Vaquero, J.J.; Peña, J.M.; Malpica, N.; del Pozo, F.: Evaluation of autofocus functions in molecular cytogenetic analysis. J. Microsc., 188 (3), (1997), 264272. ISSN . doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.2630819.x.
[35] Sun, Y.; Duthaler, S.; Nelson, B.J.: Autofocusing in computer microscopy: selecting the optimal focus algorithm. Microsc. Res. Tech., 65 (3) (2004), 139149. ISSN , . doi: 10.1002/jemt.20118.
[36] Erteza, A.: Sharpness index and its application to focus control. Appl. Opt., 15 (4) (1976), 877881.
[37] Huang, J.-T.; Shen, C.-H.; Phoong, S.-M.; Chen, H.: Robust measure of image focus in the wavelet domain, in Proc. of 2005 Int. Symp. on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, 2005. ISPACS 2005, Hong Kong, China, 2005, 157160, IEEE.
[38] Xie, H.; Rong, W.; Sun, L.: Wavelet-based focus measure and 3-d surface reconstruction method for microscopy images, in 2006 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, 2006, 229234, IEEE.
[39] Yang, G.; Nelson, B.J.: Wavelet-based autofocusing and unsupervised segmentation of microscopic images, in 2003 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003. (IROS 2003). Proc., vol. 3, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2003, 21432148, IEEE.
[40] Lee, S.-Y.; Yoo, J.-T.; Kumar, Y.; Kim, S.-W.: Reduced Energy-Ratio Measure for Robust Autofocusing in Digital Camera. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 16 (2) (2009), 133136. ISSN . doi: 10.1109/LSP.2008.2008938.
[41] Shen, C.H.; Chen, H.H.: Robust focus measure for low-contrast images, in Int. Conf. on Consumer Electronics, 2006. ICCE'06. 2006 Digest of Technical Papers, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 6970, 2006, IEEE.
[42] Byrne, D.; O'Halloran, M.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E.: Data independent radar beamforming algorithms for breast cancer detection. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 107 (2010), 331348.
[43] Wang, Z.; Bovik, A.C.; Sheikh, H.R.; Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 13 (4) (2004), 600612. ISSN . doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
[44] Lazebnik, M. et al. : A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol., 52 (10), (2007), 26372656. ISSN , . doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/10/001.
[45] Lazebnik, M. et al. : A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys. Med. Biol., 52 (20), (2007), 60936115. ISSN , . doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/002.
[46] Zastrow, E.; Davis, S.K.; Lazebnik, M.; Kelcz, F.; Veen, B.D.V.; Hagness, S.C.: Database of 3d grid-based numerical breast phantoms for use in computational electromagnetics simulations (2008). http://uwcem.ece.wisc.edu/home.htm, 2008. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison.
[47] Oliveira, B.; O'Halloran, M.; Conceicao, R.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E.: Development of clinically-informed 3D tumor models for microwave imaging applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 15 (2015), 11. ISSN , . doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2015.2456051.

Keywords

Focal quality metrics for the objective evaluation of confocal microwave images

  • Declan O'loughlin (a1), Finn Krewer (a1), Martin Glavin (a1), Edward Jones (a1) and Martin O'halloran (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed