Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:08:55.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and implementation of Butler matrix-based beam-forming networks for low sidelobe level electronically scanned arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2014

Fanourios E. Fakoukakis ,
Theodoros N. Kaifas ,
Elias E. Vafiadis Open the ORCID record for Elias E. Vafiadis [Opens in a new window]  and
George A. Kyriacou
Fanourios E. Fakoukakis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, GR67100, Greece
Theodoros N. Kaifas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR54124, Greece
Elias E. Vafiadis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR54124, Greece
George A. Kyriacou*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, GR67100, Greece
*
Corresponding author: G.A. Kyriacou Email: gkyriac@ee.duth.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, the design, fabrication, and testing of low sidelobe level (SLL) Butler matrix-based beamformers is presented. The paper is divided in two parts. The first part deals with the conventional technique of simultaneous excitation of input ports. The second part introduces some novel modified low SLL Butler matrices, as an alternative advantageous design choice. Circuit architecture makes use of asymmetric branch line couplers able to provide high values of output power division ratios. Radiation patterns with SLLs far lower than −23 dB are achieved, without the use of any additional circuitry, in opposition to the case of simultaneous port excitation. Apart from SLL reduction, the switched line-phase shifter technique is applied in order to increase the number of radiated beams and improve scanning coverage. The beamformers are suitable for interference suppressing point-to-multipoint ground communications, satellite and radar/EW/SIGINT systems. Several microstrip circuit prototypes are designed, fabricated, and tested, whereas extended simulation and measurements results are adduced.

Keywords

Antenna designModeling and measurementsSmart antennasDigital beam formingMIMO
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 69 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Hansen, R.C.: Phased Array Antennas, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2009.Google Scholar
[2]Mailloux, R.J.: Phased Array Antenna Handbook, 2nd ed., Artech House, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
[3]Lo, Y.T.; Lee, S.W.: Antenna Handbook; Theory, Applications and Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
[4]Volakis, J.L.: Antenna Engineering Handbook, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007.Google Scholar
[5]Bhattacharyya, A.K.: Phased Array Antennas; Floquet Analysis, Synthesis, BFNs, and Active Array Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2006.Google Scholar
[6]Finkenzeller, K.: RFID Handbook; Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, England, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Butler, J.L.; Lowe, R.: Beam forming matrix simplifies design of electronically scanned antennas. Electron. Des., 9 (1961), 170–173.Google Scholar
[8]Shelton, J.P.; Kelleher, K.L.: Multiple beams from linear arrays. IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., 9 (1961), 154–161.Google Scholar
[9]Shelton, J.P.; Reduced sidelobes for Butler-matrix-fed linear arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 17 (1969), 645–647.Google Scholar
[10]Moody, H.J.: The systematic design of the Butler matrix. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 12 (1964), 786–788.Google Scholar
[11]Schuss, J.J. et al. : The IRIDIUM main mission antenna concept. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 47 (1999), 416–424.Google Scholar
[12]Pattan, B.: The versatile butler matrix. Microw. J., 48 (2004), 126–138.Google Scholar
[13]Gruszczynski, S.; Wincza, K.; Sachse, K.: Reduced sidelobe four-beam N-element antenna arrays fed by 4xN Butler matrices. IEEE Antennas Propag. Lett., 5 (2006), 430–434.Google Scholar
[14]Li, W.R. et al. : Switched-beam antenna based on modified Butler matrix with low sidelobe level. Electronics Letters, 40 (2004), 290–292.Google Scholar
[15]Skolnik, M.I.: Introduction to Radar Systems, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[16]Siachalou, E. et al. : On the design of switched-beam wideband base stations. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 46 (2004), 158–167.Google Scholar
[17]Fakoukakis, F.E.; Kyriacou, G.A.: On the design of a Butler matrix-based beamformer introducing low sidelobe level and enhanced beam-pointing accuracy, ICEAA-IEEE APWC, Torino, Italy, 2011.Google Scholar
[18]Gotsis, K.A.; Kyriacou, G.A.; Sahalos, J.N.: Improved Butler matrix configuration for smart beamforming operations, Fourth Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation, (EuCAP), Barcelona, Spain, 2010.Google Scholar
[19]DuFort, E.C.: Optimum low sidelobe high crossover multiple beam antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 33 (1985), 946–954.Google Scholar
[20]DuFort, E.C.: Optimum networks for simultaneous multiple beam antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 40 (1992), 1–7.Google Scholar
[21]Fragola, A.; Orefice, M.; Pirola, M.: A modified Butler matrix for tapered excitation of scanned arrays, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., Boston, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
[22]Fakoukakis, F.E.; Kyriacou, G.A.; Sahalos, J.N.: On the design of Butler-like type matrices for low SLL multibeam antennas, Sixth Eur. Conf. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Prague, Czech Republic, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Chang, C.C.; Lee, R.H.; Shih, T.Y.: Design of a beam switching/steering Butler matrix for phased array system. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 58 (2010), 367–374.Google Scholar
[24]Allen, J.L.: A theoretical limitation on the formation of lossless multiple beams in linear arrays. IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., 9 (1961), 350–352.Google Scholar
[25]White, W.D.: Pattern limitations in multiple-beam antennas. IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., 10 (1962), 430–436.Google Scholar
[26]Stein, S.: On cross-coupling in multiple beam antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 10 (1962), 548–557.Google Scholar
[27]Kim, Y.B. et al. : A branch line hybrid having arbitrary power division ratio and port impedances, Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf., Yokohama, Japan, 2006.Google Scholar
[28]Cummings, W.C.: Multiple Beam Forming Networks, Technical note 1978–79, MIT Lincoln Lab, Lexington, MA, 1978.Google Scholar
[29]Fakoukakis, F.E.; Kaifas, T.N.; Kyriacou, G.A.: Ultra-wideband radio frequency beamforming using microwave BFNs, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp. (PIERS), Moscow, Russia, 2012.Google Scholar
[30]Fakoukakis, F.E.; Kyriacou, G.A.: Novel Nolen matrix based beamforming networks for series-fed low SLL multibeam antennas. Progr. Electromagn. Res. B, 51 (2013), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar