Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:23:02.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

LOCAL FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE LATTER HALF OF THE TANG DYNASTY: ON PREFECTURAL FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, INCLUDING THE METROPOLITAN PREFECTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2018

Watanabe Shin'ichirō*
Affiliation:
Kyoto Prefectural University E-mail dubian2016@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract

This article analyzes the special historical characteristics of prefecture-level regional financial administration during the latter half of the Tang Dynasty, which had as its primary revenue source the twice-a-year tax legally established in 780. Prefectural financial administration during this period consisted of three components: the portion of the twice-a-year tax retained by prefectures (liuzhou), “money for public use” (gongyongqian), and the ever-normal and charity granaries (changping yicang). Each of these elements made its appearance at separate times from the Northern Wei to the Sui. Following the establishment of the twice-a-year tax law, they became consolidated as components of prefectural financial administration at the beginning of the ninth century. At the same time, these components of prefectural financial administration became subject to the control of the central government, especially with regard to the “money for public use,” the section over which prefectures exercised the broadest discretion. In the early Northern Song, at the end of the tenth century, all revenue sources (beyond those used to meet obligatory expenses such as the stipends of bureaucrats) came to be retrieved by the central government, and prefectural financial administration came to be placed directly under central control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Funakoshi 1978 Funakoshi, Taiji 船越 泰次. “Tōdai kōki no jōheigisō” 唐代後期の常平義倉, 1978; rpt. as part 3, chapter 1 of his Tōdai ryōzeihō kenkyū 唐代兩税法研究. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 1996.Google Scholar
Funakoshi 1973 Funakoshi, Taiji 船越 泰次. “Tōdai ryōzeihō ni okeru kokuto no chōka to ryōzeisen no setteki setsunō mondai: ryōzeihō no kazei taikei ni kanrenshite” 唐代兩税法における斛斗の徴科と兩税錢の折糴・折納問題: 兩税法の課税體系に關連して, 1973; rpt. as part 2, chapter 2 of his Tōdai ryōzeihō kenkyū 唐代兩税法研究. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 1996.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi 1966 Hamaguchi, Shigekuni 浜口 重国. Shinkanzuitōshi no kenkyū 秦漢隋唐史の研究. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1966.Google Scholar
Hino 1982 Hino, Kaisaburō 日野 開三郎. Tōdai ryō zeihō no kenkyū 唐代両税法の研究. Tokyo: San'ichi Shobō, 1982.Google Scholar
Hori 1953 Hori, Toshikazu 堀 敏一. “Godai Sōsho ni okeru kinji no hatten 五代宋初における禁事の發展.Tōyō Bunka Kenkyūjo Kiyō 4 (1953).Google Scholar
Kikuchi 1958 Kikuchi, Hideo 菊池 英夫. “Godai Gōshū ni okeru kingun kaikaku no haikei: Seisō gunsei kaikaku zenshi 五代後周における禁軍改革の背景————世宗軍制改革前史.Tōhōgaku 16 (1958).Google Scholar
Kikuchi 1954 Kikuchi, Hideo 菊池 英夫. “Godai kingun no chihō kyūton 五代禁軍の地方駐屯.Tōyō Shigaku 11 (1954).Google Scholar
Saeki 1971 Saeki, Tomi 佐伯 富. Chūgokushi kenkyū dai 2 中国史研究. 第 2. Kyoto: Tōyōshi Kenkyūkai, 1971.Google Scholar
Watanabe 2010 Watanabe, Shin'ichirō 渡邊 信一郎, Chūgoku kodai no zaisei to kokka 中國古代の財政と國家 [Financial administration and the state in Ancient China]. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin 汲古書院, 2010.Google Scholar