Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:17:48.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Non-Linear Theory of Spiral Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G. Contopoulos*
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, c/o CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The main steps of the non-linear theory of spiral structure are described. Near each of the main resonances the basic periodic orbits are calculated, and the sets of non-periodic orbits that follow them are found. A different integral of motion is applicable for each set, besides the Jacobi integral. Then the initial distribution function, f, is expressed as a function of the two integrals and the corresponding angles. The final distribution function is found by averaging over the angles: Then by integrating over all velocities we find the response density σresp. In order that σresp should be equal to the imposed density, σimp we must adjust the parameters of the imposed spiral field. The form of σresp away from resonances can be derived explicitely for tight ana open spirals or bars; however near the resonances σresp can be only calculated numerically. If the imposed field has almost constant amplitude, then the amplitude of the response is very large near the Inner Lindblad Resonance. In the case of a tight spiral the azimuth of the response density maximum with respect to the imposed density maximum tends to zero outside the ILR, while it tends to -90° inside the ILR. One possible self-consistent solution has zero amplitude inside the ILR both in the case of tight spirals and of bars. Finally an important quadrupole term was found near the ILR.

Type
Part IV: Kinematics and Dynamical Evolution of the Galaxy
Copyright
Copyright © Geneva Observatory 1977

References

Born, M. 1927, The Mechanics of the Atom, Bell, London.Google Scholar
Contopoulos, G. 1963, Astron. J. 68, 763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contopoulos, G. 1970, Astrophys. J. 160, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contopoulos, G. 1973, Astrophys. J. 181, 657.Google Scholar
Contopoulos, G. 1975a, Astrophys. J. 201, 566.Google Scholar
Contopoulos, G. 1975b, in Weliachew, L. (ed.) The Dynamics of Spiral Galaxie, Observatoire de Paris. de paris.Google Scholar
Contopoulos, G. and Mertzanides, C. 1977, Astron. Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Crane, P. 1975, Astrophys. J. 197, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.C., Yuan, C. and Shu, F. 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 721.Google Scholar
Vendervoort, P.O. 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 739.Google Scholar
Vendervoort, P.O. 1975, Astrophys. J. 201, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendervoort, P.O. and Monet, D.G. 1975, Astrophys. J. 201, 311.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E.T. 1904, Analytic Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar