Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-72csx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:00:15.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Origins of the Terms “Major” and “Minor” in American Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Phillip W. Payton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps one of the mostly highly complex developments in the history of American higher education has been that of majoring, or the ever-growing specialization in the undergraduate curriculum. Certainly much of this has stemmed from the modern industrial revolution, which has produced a need for trained experts in a vast number of specialized fields. Institutions of higher learning have become divisive and differentiated, and the principle of election and the requirements of graduate schools have served as entering wedges for undergraduate concentration of studies in one or a few closely related subjects.

Type
Research Article
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1961 , pp. 57 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 1961, University of Pittsburgh Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See Freeman Butts, R., The College Charts Its Course (New York, 1939), based on Butts's The Development of the Principle of Election of Studies in American Colleges and Universities, (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1935).Google Scholar

2. Cowley, W. H., “An Appraisal of American Higher Education,” (unpublished lecture notes, Stanford University, 1956), 452–59. The present writer gratefully acknowledges Professor Cowley's counsel and instruction.Google Scholar

3. Johns Hopkins University, Official Circular No. 7, Register for the Preliminary Year 1876–77 (Baltimore, 1877), 18–19.Google Scholar

4. Johns Hopkins University, Johns Hopkins Register for the Second Year, 1877–78 (Baltimore, 1878), 21.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., 22, 24.Google Scholar

6. Johns Hopkins University, Register for the Year 1880–81 (Baltimore, 1881), 36.Google Scholar

7. Johns Hopkins University, Third Annual Report of the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, 1878), 23–24.Google Scholar

8. Delevan Perry, Edward, “The American University,” in Butler, Nicholas M., ed., Education in the United States (New York, 1910), 292.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., 293.Google Scholar

10. Johns Hopkins University, Register for the Year 1880–81, 32.Google Scholar

11. Corson, Louis D., “University Problems as Described in the Personal Correspondence Among D. C. Gilman, A. D. White, and C. W. Eliot,” (unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1951), 82. The writer expresses deep gratitude to Corson for his discovery of this passage in the 1880 Circular which suggested the origin of major-minor plans at Hopkins. See Corson dissertation, 184.Google Scholar

12. Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins University Circulars, No. 4 (Baltimore, 1880), 39.Google Scholar

13. Johns Hopkins University, Eleventh Annual Report of the President of the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, 1886), 86.Google Scholar

14. Flexner, Abraham, Daniel Coit Gilman (New York, 1946), 73.Google Scholar

15. Rashdall, Hastings, The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages, eds., Powicke, F. M. and Emden, A. B. (Oxford, 1936), I, 440.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., 443.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., III, 153–55.Google Scholar

18. Paetow, L., “The Arts Course at Medieval Universities with Special Reference to Grammar and Rhetoric,” University of Illinois Studies, III (1910), 50.Google Scholar

19. Ibid., 33–36, 50–53.Google Scholar

20. Morison, S. E., The Founding of Harvard College (Cambridge, Mass., 1935), 67–68.Google Scholar

21. Franklin Snow, Louis, The College Curriculum in the United States, in Teachers College Contribution to Education, X (N. Y., 1907), 104–40.Google Scholar

22. Gilman, Daniel C., “The Group System of College Studies in the Johns Hopkins University,” The Andover Review, V (1886), 573–74.Google Scholar

23. Johns Hopkins University, Eleventh Annual Report of the President, 11.Google Scholar

24. Gilman, 572–73.Google Scholar

25. Johns Hopkins University, Register for the Year 1876–77, 19–20.Google Scholar

26. Johns Hopkins University, Register for the Year 1880–81, 33.Google Scholar

27. Johns Hopkins University, Register for the Year 1881–82, 35.Google Scholar

28. Gilman, 575.Google Scholar