Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:01:42.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Death of the Liberal Arts College

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

James Axtell
James Axtell*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To every thing, said the Preacher, there is a season, a time to be born and a time to die. But sometimes the students of Life misread its signs and prematurely bury one whose time has yet to come. Historians no less than journalists sometimes write obituaries when they should be appraising the tenacity of age. Over the past twenty years historians of American higher education have fallen deeply into the trap of prematurity; the obituary they wrote reads something like this:

Washington, D.C., 2 July 1862. The American Liberal Arts College died today after a prolonged illness. It was 226 years old.

Type
The Liberal Arts College in the Age of the University
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Winter 1971 , pp. 339 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 History of Education Quarterly 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Hofstadter, Richard, The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States (New York, 1955), pp. 209, 223; Hofstadter, , The Development and Scope of Higher Education in the United States (New York, 1952), pp. 20–21; Ernest Earnest, “Death and Transfiguration,” Academic Procession (Indianapolis, 1953), ch. 5.Google Scholar

2. Schmidt, George P., The Liberal Arts College (New Brunswick, 1957), p. 146; Brickman, William and Lehrer, Stanley, eds., A Century of Higher Education (New York, 1962), ch. 3; Hofstadter, , Development and Scope, p. 48; Peterson, George E., The New England College in the Age of the University (Amherst, 1964), p. 3.Google Scholar

3. Hofstadter, , Development of Academic Freedom pp. 222–38; Hofstadter, and Smith, Wilson, eds., American Higher Education: A Documentary History 1 (Chicago, 1961) : 251–391; Hofstadter, , “The Revolution in Higher Education,” in Paths of American Thought, ed. Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr. and White, Morton (Boston, 1963), pp. 270–71 (italics added).Google Scholar

4. Ibid. (italics added).Google Scholar

5. Boorstin, Daniel, The Americans: The National Experience (New York, 1965), pp. 152–61.Google Scholar

6. Hofstadter, , Development and Scope p. 11; Storr, Richard, “Academic Culture and the History of American Higher Education,” Journal of General Education 5 (October 1950) : 12; Stone, Lawrence, “ The Ninneversity,”' The New York Review of Books, January 28, 1971, p. 24. John Talbott makes a similar point in “The History of Education,” Daedalus (Winter 1971), pp. 142–43.Google Scholar

7. Rudolph, Frederick, “Neglect of Students as a Historical Tradition,” in The College and the Student, ed. Dennis, Lawrence E. and Kauffman, Joseph F. (Washington, 1966), p. 53.Google Scholar

8. Le Duc, Thomas, Piety and Intellect at Amherst College, 1865–1912 (New York, 1946); Pierson, George W., Yale College: An Educational History, 1871–1921 (New Haven, 1952); Peterson, George E., The New England College in the Age of the University (Amherst, 1964); Barnard, John, From Evangelicalism to Progressivism at Oberlin College, 1866–1917 (Columbus, Ohio, 1969); Veysey, Laurence R., The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965). There is also the possibility that the colleges and the universities were responding to two different questions or sets of questions, in which case R. G. Collingwood's advice is pertinent. You cannot discover a man's meaning, he said, simply from his written or spoken statements, even when he is perfectly articulate and honest. “In order to find out his meaning you must also know what the question was (a question in his own mind, and presumed by him to be in yours) to which the thing he has said or written was meant as an answer.” Furthermore, as Richard Storr has warned, “even when vocabulary does not change, meanings do; and where denotations are static, connotations may be fluid” (Storr, “Academic Culture and the History of American Higher Education,” p. 11); Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory 8 (1969) : 37–38.Google Scholar

9. Storr, , “Academic Culture and the History of American Higher Education,” p. 11. See also Nisbet, Robert A., Social Change and History (New York, 1969), pp. 267–304.Google Scholar

10. Cowley, W. H., “The History of Student Residential Housing,” School and Society, December 1–8, 1934, pp. 705–12, 758–64.Google Scholar

11. A study in 1913 established that thirty-two of sixty “representative” colleges, including large state and private universities, maintained compulsory chapel (Claus, Henry T., “The Problem of College Chapel,” Educational Review [September 1913], pp. 177–87). Of Wisconsin's three presidents after the Civil War, one was a minister and two had studied theology without entering the ministry. At Minnesota, Cyrus Northrup “sanctified” the “godless institution” left to him by his predecessor with a nonsectarian but effective “evangelical religion” (Merle Curti and Vernon Carstensen, The University of Wisconsin, 1848–1925 1 [Madison, 1949]; Gray, James, The University of Minnesota, 1851–1951 [Minneapolis, 1951], pp. 83–85).Google Scholar

12. Waldo Emerson, Ralph, An Oration, Delivered Before the Phi Beta Kappa Society, at Cambridge, August 31, 1837 (Boston, 1837).Google Scholar

13. Thwing, Charles F., “College Men First Among Successful Citizens,” The Forum (June 1893), pp. 494–503. See George, W. Pierson's recent study of The Education of American Leaders (New York, 1969) for a comparison.Google Scholar

14. A study of the career choices of seven Yale classes between 1860 and 1920 reveals that significant numbers of sons of fathers in lower status occupations, such as farming and the ministry, chose and were able to choose professions at graduation one or two levels higher on the current status scale, especially law and business (Sam Scovil, unpublished seminar paper, Yale University, 1970).Google Scholar

15. Thwing, Charles F., American Colleges: Their Students and Work 2d ed. (New York, 1883), pp. 202–10.Google Scholar

16. Perry Bingham, Albert, “Present Status of the Elective System in American Colleges,” Educational Review (November 1897), pp. 360–69.Google Scholar

17. Solberg, Winton U., The University of Illinois, 1867–1894 (Urbana, 1968), pp. 105, 130, 235; Curti, and Carstensen, , Wisconsin, 1: 399–402.Google Scholar

18. Nisbet, , Social Change and History; Bagby, Philip, Culture and History (London, 1958); Kroeber, A. L., Anthropology (New York, 1948); Kneller, George F., Educational Anthropology: An Introduction (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

19. Rudolph, , “Neglect of Students as a Historical Tradition,” pp. 47–58.Google Scholar

20. Oscar, and Handlin, Mary F., The American College and American Culture (New York, 1970).Google Scholar

21. Fletcher, Robert, History of Oberlin College (Oberlin, 1943).Google Scholar

22. Blackwood, James R., The House on College Avenue: The Comptons at Wooster, 1891–1913 (Cambridge, 1968); Stone, Lawrence, “Prosopography,” Daedalus (Winter 1971), pp. 46–79.Google Scholar

23. Ernest Earnest, Academic Procession, ch. 6.Google Scholar