Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:16:04.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“An Indelible Mark”: Gay Purges in Higher Education in the 1940s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Margaret A. Nash  and
Jennifer A. R. Silverman
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In June 1948, Wisconsin Superior Court Judge Roy H. Proctor sentenced four University of Wisconsin students to one year probation for “participating in abnormal sexual activities.” The four students were among a group of twelve men on and off campus who had been arrested by city and university police. Their sentence was mild, given that the judge could have put them in prison for up to five years. Judge Proctor warned them that if there was a second offense, they should not expect leniency. “Each and all of you should feel deeply ashamed,” Proctor told them; “your conduct has caused an indelible mark to be placed against you. Certainly you will have to watch your step in the future, not only to avoid becoming second offenders, but to allay all suspicions of your becoming involved again.” Indeed, when one of the young men tried to move on with his life, university administrators made sure that the “indelible mark” followed him.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 441 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 History of Education Society 

References

1 “Morals Offenses Bring Probation,” Wisconsin State Journal, June 21, 1948, 9.Google Scholar

2 To protect the anonymity of disciplinary files, we are using a pseudonym for any individuals whose records we have only via disciplinary files. In cases where information is gleaned from public sources, such as newspapers, we are using the actual names.Google Scholar

3 Weiler, Kathleen, “The Case of Martha Deane: Sexuality and Power at Cold War UCLA,” History of Education Quarterly 47 (Winter 2007): 470–96; D'Emilio, John, Making Trouble: Essays on Gay History, Politics, and the University (New York: Routledge, 1992); Dilley, Patrick, Queer Man on Campus: A History of Non-Heterosexual College Men, 1945–2000 (New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2002).Google Scholar

4 Syrett, Nicholas L., “The Boys of Beaver Meadow: A Homosexual Community at 1920s Dartmouth College,” American Studies 48 (Summer 2007): 9–18; Wright, William, Harvard's Secret Court: The Savage 1920 Purge of Campus Homosexuals (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2005).Google Scholar

5 Bérubé, Allan, Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War Two (New York: The Free Press, 1990); Johnson, David K., The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004); Braukman, Stacy, Communists and Perverts Under the Palms: The Johns Committee 1956–1965 (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2012); Graves, Karen L., And They Were Wonderful Teachers: Florida's Purge of Gay and Lesbian Teachers (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009). For a review of the field of the history of education and gays, lesbians, and bisexuals, see Graves, Karen, “‘So, You Think You Have a History?': Taking a Q from Lesbian and Gay Studies in Writing Education History,” History of Education Quarterly 52 (November 2012): 465–87.Google Scholar

6 Historian David Johnson draws a distinction between a person constituting a security risk versus a loyalty risk. Loyalty was a state of mind; a Communist sympathizer was a loyalty risk. A person might be a security risk, however, by engaging in behavior that might lead to betraying secrets either inadvertently (by sharing too much information while under the influence of alcohol, for instance) or begrudgingly because of being blackmailed (under threat of having one's homosexuality exposed, for instance). Johnson, The Lavender Scare, 5–7. Also see Braukman, Communists and Perverts. Google Scholar

7 Johnson, The Lavender Scare; Kinsey, Alfred, Pomeroy, Wardell, and Martin, Clyde, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1948), 623, 659.Google Scholar

8 “Post-Kinsey: Voluntary Sex Relations as Criminal Offenses,” The University of Chicago Law Review (January 1949): 182.Google Scholar

9 Johnson, The Lavender Scare, 54.Google Scholar

10 Bérubé, Coming Out Under Fire. Google Scholar

11 Bailey, Beth, Sex in the Heartland (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Johnson, The Lavender Scare, 56.Google Scholar

13 Cox, Alice, “The Rainey Affair: A History of the Academic Freedom Controversy at the University of Texas, 1938–1946,” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Denver, 1970).Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 78.Google Scholar

15 Ibid.Google Scholar

16 “Charges Texas Prexy Hid ‘Nest’ of Perversion,”’ Chicago Daily Tribune, November 18, 1944, 16.Google Scholar

17 Bullington, Senate Proceedings, I, p. 450, as quoted in Cox, “The Rainey Affair,” 113–114.Google Scholar

18 “Charges Texas Prexy Hid ‘Nest” of Perversion,” Chicago Daily Tribune, November 18, 1944, 16.Google Scholar

19 Rainey, Homer P., The Tower and the Dome: A Free University versus Political Control (Boulder, CO: Pruett Publishing Co., 1971).Google Scholar

20 “Professors Ask Full Inquiry on Texas U. Morals,” Chicago Daily Tribune, November 22, 1944, 12.Google Scholar

21 Painter, George, “The Sensibilities of Our Forefathers: The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States,” http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/wisconsin.htm; downloaded March 25, 2014.Google Scholar

22 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/12/06/60870, downloaded March 25, 2014.Google Scholar

23 “Morals Offenses Bring Probation,” Wisconsin State Journal, June 21, 1948, 9; “Haresfoot Secretary Draws $100 Fine,” Wisconsin State Journal, June 17, 1948, 7.Google Scholar

24 Memorandum from Brady, Thomas A. to President Frederick Middlebush, President, University of Missouri, December 7, 1949, 5. This Memo includes a report on “Practice at University of Wisconsin.”Google Scholar

25 Ibid., 2.Google Scholar

26 Bérubé, Coming Out Under Fire, 146.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., 5, 7.Google Scholar

28 “Morals Offenses Bring Probation,” 9.Google Scholar

29 “Two Men Fined for Obscene Literature,” Wisconsin State Journal, September 29, 1948, 13.Google Scholar

30 Pritchett, Keith is a pseudonym. “Edgerton Man Hit By Flak On Munich Trip,” Wisconsin State Journal, July 11, 1944, 1.Google Scholar

31 Student Affairs, Division of Committees and Councils, Discipline, Box 4, Folder July 1948, University of Wisconsin Archives, Steenbock Memorial Library.Google Scholar

32 Memorandum from Brady, Thomas A. to President Frederick Middlebush, President, University of Missouri, December 7, 1949.Google Scholar

33 “Missouri U. Professor in Sex Scandal: Prosecutor Charges Abnormal Orgies,” St. Joseph News-Press, May 27, 1948, 1; “Morals Charge Filed Against M.U. Teacher: Journalism Professor, Two Friends Booked After 2-week Probe,” The Nevada Daily Mail, May 27, 1948, 1; “Journalism Professor Charged with Sodomy,” Schenectady Gazette, May 28, 1948, 3; “Mad Parties Get Professor Fired,” The Spokesman-Review, May 28, 1948, 16; “Sex Offenses Charged to 3: Two Others Sought in Missouri Scandal,” Toledo Blade, May 28, 1948, 4; “Accused In Sex Cases, Professor Posts Bond,” The Sun, May 29, 1948, 4; “Accused Journalism Teacher at Missouri Fired By Curators,” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 5, 1948, 13; “4 Named in Missouri University Sex Orgy Probe Plead Guilty,” Chicago Daily Tribune, June 7, 1949, 10.Google Scholar

34 Memorandum from Brady, Thomas A. to President Frederick Middlebush, President, University of Missouri, December 7, 1949.Google Scholar

35 Ibid.Google Scholar

36 Ibid.Google Scholar

37 Bailey, Sex in the Heartland, 53, 66.Google Scholar

38 Eckhardt to Middlebush letter, 4.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., 3.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., 3.Google Scholar

41 Letter from JJ to Mann, Frank C., December 15, 1949. Frank Mann Papers, 1943–1951, General Correspondence, UM-System Board of Curators, University Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, UW:1/6/2 MFR 4 FF 7–8. [Note: here and in the following, initials of correspondents are used when names are confidential.]Google Scholar

42 Ibid.Google Scholar

43 Letter from JJ to The Committee on Discipline for Men, University of Missouri, December 31, 1949. Frank Mann Papers, 1943–1951, General Correspondence, UM-System Board of Curators, University Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Mo, UW:l/6/2 MFR 4 FF 7–8.Google Scholar

44 Letter from RJ to Middlebush, Frederick A., President, University of Missouri, January 8, 1950. Frank Mann Papers, 1943–1951, General Correspondence, UM-System Board of Curators, University Archives, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Mo, UW:1/6/2 MFR 4 FF 7–8.Google Scholar

45 Dudziak, Mary L., Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

46 Letter from RJ to Mann, Frank C., March 7, 1950.Google Scholar

47 Letter from RJ to Frederick A. Middlebush, January 8, 1980.Google Scholar

48 Dilley, Queer Man on Campus. Google Scholar

49 Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992); Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar