Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T03:42:47.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In History or Beyond History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2011

C. C. McCown
C. C. McCown
Affiliation:
Pacific School of Religion
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Any wise psychologist will insist that a period of personal depression is not an appropriate time for meditation on the meaning of life. Yet it is such times that most individuals select. A period of social depression, retrogression, and catastrophe is hardly opportune for the deliberate and detached examination of the meaning of history. Yet it is in “times of trouble” that men seem most inclined to somber meditation on the subject. Numerous current publications testify that the relationship of Christianity and its doctrine of revelation to history is one of the most serious problems that the present generation of theologians has to face. Paul Tillich has characterized history as the problem of our age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , July 1945 , pp. 151 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Kingdom of God and History (Chicago: Willett, Clark, and Co., 1938), p. 7Google Scholar.

2 See McCown, , “Hebrew and Egyptian Apocalyptic Literature,” Harvard Theological Review, XVIII (1925), pp. 357–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The Genesis of the Social Gospel, New York, 1929Google Scholar.

3 Dodd, C. H., Parables of the Kingdom (New York: Scribners, 1936), p. 109Google Scholar.

4 On the “either-or fallacy” and the “fallacies of antithesis, abstraction, and misplaced concreteness” see the writer's remarks in the Journal of Religion, XVI (1936), pp. 31 ffGoogle Scholar.

5 Cf. Whitehead, A. N., Modes of Thought (Cambridge: University Press, 1938), pp. 185Google Scholar, 235 f.; Science and the Modern World (New York: Macmillan, 1925), pp. 106 f.Google ScholarPubMed; Adventures of Ideas (New York: Macmillan, 1933), p. 153Google ScholarPubMed; in Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (Evanston and Chicago: Northwestern University, 1941), p. 688Google Scholar; Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), pp. 6 ff.Google Scholar, 17 ff.

6 Whitehead, Modes of Thought, p. 3.

7 Nature and Destiny of Man, II, p. 95.

8 They have likewise misled evolutionary optimists and all idealists, including the “social gospel” movement. See further discussion below.

9 Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (Evanston and Chicago, 1941), pp. 4 fGoogle Scholar.

10 He refers to none of the recent philosophical discussions except to that of Karl Mannheim, so far as I have discovered.

11 Nature, Man, and God (London: Macmillan, 1935), pp. 448, 450Google ScholarPubMed.

12 Christian News Letter, No. 198 (Dec. 29, 1943), Supplement, pp. 11 f., reprinted in Christianity and Crisis, IV, 1 (Feb. 7, 1944), p. 6.

13 Nature, Man, and God, p. 450.