¹ Draguet (pp. 16–17) discusses the relations between the Tomus and the Oratio contra Dyophysitas mentioned by Zacharias Rhetor and Michael Syrus, and suggests, without accepting the view, that as the Tomus was confined to the defence of Christ's ἀϕθαρσία, the Oratio may have been a more general polemic against the views of the Dyophysites.

² Draguet (p. 34) corrects the mistaken supposition that the Additiones formed a separate work by Julian.

³ Apparently the scribe made an amusing blunder and miscopied the title κατὰ τῶν βλασϕημιῶν Σευήρου as κατὰ βλασϕημιῶν ἐπὶ Σευῆρον, a fact that Severus modestly ascribed to the immediate intervention of Providence.

⁴ Draguet (p. 43) is inclined to place this work between the Additiones and the Adversus blasphemias Severi.

⁵ Draguet, pp. 50–73, especially pp. 62–72.

⁶ Draguet, p. 13, n. 6. Five fragments of Severus' Third Letter exist in Greek in the Epistola Eustathii monachi de duabus naturis adversus Severum; Migne P. G. 86, 929 ff.; Draguet, p. 29, n. 7.

⁷ Fragments 6–49. References to the MSS. are supplied in the apparatus.

⁸ Draguet, Fragments 130, 131. Cf. pp. 16–18. See above note 1.

⁹ Draguet, pp. 25, 26: “Mai a donné une traduction partielle de la Critique dans le Spicilegium Romanum (x. 1. pp. 169–201), mais on ne peut l'utiliser qu'en la contrôlant d'assez près.” Six fragments are extant in Greek, one of which cannot be verified from the Syriac; Draguet, p. 25, n. 9.

¹⁰ Draguet, p. 31.

¹¹ Draguet, Fragments 50–56; cf. p. 34.

¹² Draguet, Fragments 75–129; cf. pp. 39, 40.

¹³ Draguet, pp. 42–44; Fragments 57–74.

¹⁴ Draguet, pp. 46, n. 4, p. 47, n. 8. Two quotations in Greek are found in Cramer's Catena on Acts; cf. Draguet, p. 47, n. 9.

¹⁵ Draguet, pp. 50–73, especially p. 50, notes 3, 4, pp. 60–62. There is a Greek extract from the Apologia pro Philalethe in the Doctrina Patrum, xx. 9, Diekamp, p. 128.

¹⁶ Diekamp, p. 356; Mai, Scriptorum veterum nova collectio, IX, pp. 728–729; Draguet, p. 80.