Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T22:16:56.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roman Cognomina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

The question of cognomina tends to be over-simplified in the elementary textbooks, where one meets such statements as: ‘Most Romans had three names … of which the third defines the familia within the gens.’ Such brevity is doubtless pedagogically convenient, but it has its dangers, particularly in respect of one of the most important periods in Roman history and literature, the late Republican; for there exceptions to this rule are so numerous and important as to make it almost meaningless. To demand greater accuracy in this matter is not mere pedantry; already a tradition is being established powerful enough to influence those whose business it is to know better, even leading, as I shall show later, to the misinterpretation of texts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 62 note 1 p. 19.

page 63 note 1 Gramm. 3.Google Scholar

page 63 note 2 Brut. 48.Google Scholar

page 63 note 3 Farn. vi. 18. 1.Google Scholar

page 63 note 4 Sai. i. 6. 85–87.

page 63 note 5 See Pliny, H.N. viii. 79. 213.Google Scholar

page 64 note 1 Ti. Gracch. 8. 4.Google Scholar

page 64 note 2 Suet. Aug. 2. 1.Google Scholar

page 64 note 3 H.N. x. 23. 45.Google Scholar

page 64 note 4 Brut. 320.

page 65 note 1 Inv. ii. 9. 28.Google Scholar

page 66 note 1 v. 10. 31.

page 66 note 2 1400b 19.

page 66 note 3 vii. 3. 27.

page 66 note 4 v. 127.

page 66 note 5 Marius 1.Google Scholar

page 66 note 6 Cf. Syme, R., The Roman Revolution (Oxford, 1939), 129, n. 4.Google Scholar