Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:29:21.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pliny in Bithynia–and what Followed*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Barbara Levick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The view that the younger Pliny was sent to the province of Pontus et Bithynia (Bithynia for short) as a ‘financial expert’ who would deal with the accounts of the cities has been thoroughly and properly discredited. Pliny in his province did all the things that his predecessors and successors did or might have done. His funerary inscription at Comum shows him to have been legatus pro praetore consulari potestate, an imperial legate, but with consular power; the regular governors had been proconsuls, men appointed by the senate for one year only after drawing lots for the post with their fellows of equal seniority. But in spite of their title they had been only ex-praetors, while Pliny had held the consulship; hence his cansularis potestas, which secured him the same number of fasces as they had enjoyed, one more than he could have held as a plain legatus Augusti pro praetore. Pliny was a governor of superior standing, chosen by Trajan on the strength of a decree of the senate, to take full charge of the province and to correct all the abuses that were rampant there (‘quoniam multa in ea emendanda apparuerint’, 32.2); and he died in office near the end of his second year of tenure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 119 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Εις ‘Pώμην 64; cf. 66.

2. Cic. ad Att. 6.2.5; 6.1.15; ad Q.fr. 1.1.25; pro Flacc. 9.20; ad Fam. 3.8.2 ff.; 10.6.

3. , Plut.Mor. 805 A–BGoogle Scholar.

4. , Tac.Ann. 14.17 (A.D. 59)Google Scholar.

5. , Juv.Sat. 15Google Scholar.

6. , Tac.Hist. 4.5 fGoogle Scholar.

7. , Phil.Vit. Sopb. 529Google Scholar.

8. Tac. Hist. 1.65.1.

9. Herodian 3.2.9.

10. Secret Hist. 30.2.

11. Εις ‘Ρώμην 94.

12. Dio Chrys. 38 ff. (discourses on Concord, with 38. 38 for ‘Ελληνικà άμαρτήματα), and 34. 48 (the Greeks are quarrelling over ‘an ass's shadow’); , Plut.Mor. 815 A and 824 E–FGoogle Scholar.

13. Εις ‘Ρώμην 97. ‘Municipals ambitio’: , Tac.Ann. 4.67.2Google Scholar.

14. 113 has the manuscript reading ‘eos qui inviti fiunt decutiones’, where Sherwin-White, A.N., Pliny's Letters, A Social and Historical Commentary (Oxford, 1966)Google Scholar, followed by R.A.B. Mynors in the O.C.T., emends to ‘invitati'. Bowersock, G., Augustus and the Greek World (Oxford, 1965), p. 148 n.3, demursGoogle Scholar, and Garnsey, P.D.A., ‘Aspects of the urban Aristocracy in the Empire’, Aufst. u. Niederg. d. röm. Welt II. i. (1975), 232Google Scholar, pronounces non liquet. The fact that the councillors were being added to ‘super legitimum numerum’ (112.1) seems decisively in favour of the emendation.

15. Cuntz, O., Herm. 61 (1926), 192 ffGoogle Scholar., followed by Guey, J., Essai sur la guerre parthique de Trajan (114–117) (Bucharest, 1937), pp. 27 ffGoogle Scholar.

16. Longden, , JRS 21 (1931), 19 f.Google Scholar; Lepper, , Trajan's Parthian War (Oxford, 1948), ch. xi (‘the case for premeditation’), pp. 164 ff.Google Scholar; Sherwin-White, p. 648 and other nn. ad locc.

17. PIR 2 i. 744; Rostovzeff, M., ABSA 22 (1916–1918), 15 f.Google Scholar; Magie, ii. 1398, and Millar, F.G.B., JRS 53 (1963), 199Google Scholar, deny that Chilo's functions exceeded those of ordinary procurators.

18. Philo, , Leg. ad Gaium 10Google Scholar.

19. , Suet.Nero 9.2Google Scholar; , Tac.Hist. 1.6Google Scholar; Pliny, , N.H. 6.40Google Scholar; Dio 63.8.1.

20. , Suet.Div. Vesp. 8.4Google Scholar; Dio 66.15.3; , Suet.Dom. 22Google Scholar; , Jos.BJ 7.244 fGoogle Scholar.

21. ILS 8795 = McCrum, M. and Woodhead, A.G., Selected documents of the principates of the Flavian Emperors (Cambridge, 1961), p. 237Google Scholar.

22. , Stat.Silv. 4.4.61Google Scholar; cf. AE 1951, no. 263 = McCrum, and Woodhead, , Docs. 369Google Scholar (a Centurion of XII Fulminata, from near Baku).

23. Strabo, 14.663.

24. See Stoian, I., Tomitana: Contribuţii epigraficela Istăţia cetăţii Tomis (Bucharest, 1962), pp. 40 fGoogle Scholar.

25. Op. cit., p. 527.

26. JRS 37 (1947), 213Google Scholar, with stimulating discussion of the effects of the military presence.

27. Levick, B.M. and Jameson, S.A., JRS 54 (1964), 103Google Scholar.