Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T19:41:52.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hannibal: What Kind of Genius?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

B. D. Hoyos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The year 1983 marks the 2300th anniversary of the outbreak of the Second Punic War, one of the most momentous conflicts in history. The outstanding figure of that war was, of course, the Carthaginian leader Hannibal, son of Hamilcar Barca. His invasion of Italy at the outset of the war was a model of strategic daring and skill. His tactics in destroying the much larger Roman army at Cannae remain a classic exemplar of a battle of envelopment. He came near to bringing down Roman power, a near-miss for which his Roman contemporaries never forgave him, while their descendants accorded him grudging respect or even admiration. These achievements have made him, indeed, the most famous of the adversaries of Rome and one of the three most highly rated generals of antiquity (with Alexander and Julius Caesar). There is some irony in this, for of the three he was the only one to fail ultimately in his enterprise.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 171 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pol. 11.19; Livy 28.12.1–9.

2. For Hannibal's likely timetable see (e.g.) SirProctor, D., Hannibal's March in History (Oxford, 1971), pp. 20–79Google Scholar; Lazenby, J. F., Hannibal's War (Warminster, 1978), pp. 32–3, 275–7Google Scholar.

3. Livy 22.58.2.

4. Ibid. § 7.

5. Pol. 7.9, esp. 9.10–16.

6. E.g. Livy 24.1.13 (Locri).

7. Picard, G. C., Hannibal (Paris [1967]), esp. pp. 231–50Google Scholar; cf. pp. 104–20.

8. Pol. 9.22.1–5.

9. Livy 22.58.2–3. There seems no reason to disbelieve this report.

10. 22.51.4.

11. Thus (e.g.) de Sanctis, G., Storia dei Romani 32.2 (Firenze, 1968), pp. 202–3Google Scholar; Hallward, B. L., Cambridge Ancient History 8 (1930), p. 55Google Scholar; Hoffmann, W., Hannibal (Göttingen, 1962), p. 73Google Scholar; Picard, p. 180; Lazenby, pp. 85–6. Lord Montgomery of Alamein agreed with Maharbal (quoted by Lazenby, p. 290 n. 47).

12. Livy 26.9.6–10.10, even if rather exaggerated for effect.

13. Livy's account is confused (27.40–2; cf. Lazenby, pp. 184–6), but no reconstruction of the facts can lend much lustre to Hannibal's generalship.

14. 30.21.1.