Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T00:29:02.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A reflection principle for solutions to the Helmholtz equation and an application to the inverse scattering problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

David Colton
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A classical result in potential theory is the Schwarz reflection principle for solutions of Laplace's equation which vanish on a portion of a spherical boundary. The question naturally arises whether or not such a property is also true for solutions of the Helmholtz equation. This has been answered in the affirmative by Diaz and Ludford ([4]; see also [10]) in the limiting case of the plane. It is the purpose of this paper to show that a reflection principle is also valid for spheres of finite radius. As an application of this result we shall study the problem of the analytic continuation of solutions to the Helmholtz equation defined in the exterior of a bounded domain in three-dimensional Euclidean space ℝ3 We shall show that through the use of the reflection principle derived in this paper, this problem can be reduced to the problem of the analytic continuation of an analytic function of two complex variables, which in turn can be performed through a variety of known methods (cf. [7]).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1977

References

REFERENCES

1.Colton, D., On the inverse scattering problem for axially symmetric solutions of the Helmholtz equation, Quart. J. Math. (Ser. 2) 22 (1971), 125130.Google Scholar
2.Colton, D., Integral operators and reflection principles for parabolic equations in one space variable, J. Differential Equations 15 (1974), 551559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Colton, D. and Wendland, W., Constructive methods for solving the exterior Neumann problem for the reduced wave equation in a spherically symmetric medium, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 75 (1976), 97107.Google Scholar
4.Diaz, J. B. and Ludford, G. S. S., Reflection principles for linear elliptic second order partial differential equations with constant coefficients, Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 39 (1955), 8795.Google Scholar
5.Eichler, M., On the differential equations uxx + uyy + N(x)u=0, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 65 (1949), 259278.Google Scholar
6.Garabedian, P. R., Partial differential equations (John Wiley, 1964).Google Scholar
7.Gilbert, R. P., Function theoretic methods in partial differentia! equations (Academic Press, 1969).Google Scholar
8.Gilbert, R. P., Constructive methods for elliptic equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 365 (Springer-Verlag, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hartman, P. and Wilcox, C., On solutions of the Helmholtz equation in exterior domains, Math. Z. 75 (1961), 228255.Google Scholar
10.John, F., Continuation and reflection of solutions to partial differential equations, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 63 (1957), 327344.Google Scholar
11.Millar, R. F., Singularities of two-dimensional exterior solutions of the Helmholtz equation, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 69 (1971), 175188.Google Scholar
12.Millar, R. F., Singularities of solutions to exterior analytic boundary value problems for the Helmholtz equation in three independent variables I. The plane boundary, SIAM. J. Math. Anal. 7 (1976), 131156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Müller, C., Radiation patterns and radiation fields, J. Rat. Mech. Anal. 4 (1955), 235246.Google Scholar
14.Sleeman, B. D., The three-dimensional inverse scattering problem for the Helmholtz equation, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 73 (1973), 477488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Weston, V. H., Bowman, J. J. and Ar, E., On the inverse electromagnetic scattering problem, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 31 (1968), 199213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar