Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:49:46.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for random distribution of sequence variants in Tenebrio molitor satellite DNA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Miroslav Plohl ,
Branko Borˇstnik ,
Vlatka Lucijanić-Justić  and
ÐurÐica Ugarković
Miroslav Plohl
Affiliation:
Ruder Boškovic Institute, Bijenićrka 54, PO Box 1016, 41000 Zagreb, Croatia
Branko Borˇstnik
Affiliation:
Boris Kidrič Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, PO Box 30, 61115 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Vlatka Lucijanić-Justić
Affiliation:
Ruder Boškovic Institute, Bijenićrka 54, PO Box 1016, 41000 Zagreb, Croatia
ÐurÐica Ugarković
Affiliation:
Ruder Boškovic Institute, Bijenićrka 54, PO Box 1016, 41000 Zagreb, Croatia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tenebrio molitor satellite DNA has been analysed in order to study sequential organization of tandemly repeated monomers, i.e. to see whether different monomer variants are distributed randomly over the whole satellite, or clustered locally. Analysed sequence variants are products of single base substitutions in a consensus satellite sequence, producing additional restriction sites. The ladder of satellite multimers obtained after digestion with restriction enzymes was compared with theoretical calculations and revealed the distribution pattern of particular monomer variants within the satellite. A defined higher order repeating structure, indicating the existence of satellite subfamilies, could not be observed. Our results show that some sequence variants are very abundant, being present in nearly 50 % of the monomers, while others are very rare (0-1 % of monomers). However, the distribution of either very frequent, or very rare sequence variants in T. molitor satellite DNA is always random. Monomer variants are randomly distributed in the total satellite DNA and thus spread across all chromosomes, indicating a relatively high rate of sequence homogenization among different chromosomes. Such a distribution of monomer variants represents a transient stage in the process of sequence homogenization, indicating the high rate of spreading in comparison with the rate of sequence variant amplification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , August 1992 , pp. 7 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Altenburger, W.Horz, W. & Zachau, H. G. (1977). Comparative analysis of three guinea pig satellite DNAs by restriction nucleases. European Journal of Biochemistry 73, 393–400.Google Scholar
Choo, K. H.Vissel, B.Nagy, A.Earle, E. & Kalitsis, P. (1991). A survey of the genomic distribution of alpha satellite DNA on all the human chromosomes, and derivation of a new consensus sequence. Nucleic Acids Research 19, 1179–1182.Google Scholar
Davis, C. A. & Wyatt, G. R. (1989). Distribution and sequence homogeneity of an abundant satellite DNA in the beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Nucleic Acids Research 17, 5579–5586.Google Scholar
Dover, G. (1982). Molecular drive: a cohesive model of species evolution. Nature 299, 111–117.Google Scholar
Dover, G. A. (1986). Molecular drive in multigene families: how biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated. Trends in Genetics 168, 159–165.Google Scholar
Dover, G. A. (1989). Linkage disequilibrium and molecular drive in the rDNA gene family. Genetics 122, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durfy, S. J. (1990). Concerted evolution of primate alpha satellite DNA. Evidence for an ancestral sequence shared by gorilla and human x chromosome alpha satellite. Journal of Molecular Biology 216, 555–566.Google Scholar
Fanning, T. G. (1987). Origin and evolution of a major feline satellite DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 197, 627–634.Google Scholar
Horz, W. & Zachau, H. G. (1977). Characterization of distinct segments in mouse satellite DNA by restriction nucleases. European Journal of Biochemistry 73, 383–392.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, A. J.MacLeod, A.Tamaki, K.Neil, D. L. & Monckton, D. G. (1991). Minisatellite repeat coding as a digital approach to DNA typing. Nature 354, 204–209.Google Scholar
Juan, C.Gosalvez, J. & Petitpierre, E. (1990). Improving beetle karyotype analysis: restriction endonuclease banding of Tenebrio molitor chromosomes. Heredity 65, 157–162.Google Scholar
Juan, C. & Petitpierre, E. (1989). C-banding and DNA content in seven species of Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera). Genome 32, 834–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohe, A. R. & Brutlag, D. L. (1986). Multiplicity of satellite DNA sequences in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 83, 696–700.Google Scholar
Petitpierre, E.Gatewood, J. M. & Schmid, C. W. (1988). Satellite DNA from the beetle Tenebrio molitor. Experientia 44, 498–499.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. S.Reig, O. A. & Zorzopulos, J. (1990). Evidence for rolling-circle replication in a major satellite DNA from the South American rodents of the genus Ctenomys. Molecular Biology and Evolution 7, 340–350.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J.Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory.Google Scholar
Southern, E. M. (1975). Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 94, 51–69.Google Scholar
Strachan, T.Webb, D.Dover, G. A. (1985). Transition stages of molecular drive in multiple-copy DNA families in Drosophila. EMBO Journal 4, 1701–1708.Google Scholar
Trick, M. & Dover, G. A. (1984). Unexpectedly slow homogenization within a repetitive DNA family shared between two subspecies of tsetse fly. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20, 322–329.Google Scholar
Ugarkovic, D.Plohl, M. & Gamulin, V. (1989). Sequence variability of satellite DNA from the mealworm Tenebrio molitor. Gene 83, 181–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburton, P. E.Willard, H. F. (1990). Genomic analysis of sequence variation in tandemly repeated DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology 216, 3–16.Google Scholar
Wright, J. M. (1989). Nucleotide sequence, genomic organization and evolution of a major repetitive DNA family in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus/hornorum). Nucleic Acids Research 17, 11–12.Google Scholar