Disclosure of interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
12th August 2024: digital purchasing is currently unavailable on Cambridge Core. Due to recent technical disruption affecting our publishing operation, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working hard to restore services as soon as possible and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2020
Apathy can be defined as a reduction of goal-directed behavior. It is frequently observed in psychiatric and neurological diseases, and presently assessed using clinical questionnaires. To understand the neural dysfunction underlying apathy, it is necessary to decompose this syndrome into elementary computational processes. A key distinction is that of costs and benefits: apathy can result either from hyposensitivity to potential rewards or from hypersensitivity to potential efforts. In this talk, I will present a behavioral paradigm that implements the conflict between effort and reward in humans, the crucial feature being that payoff is proportional to the energy expended. As suggested by model-based analyses of neuro-imaging and patient studies, such a paradigm might provide some insights into the brain mechanisms underlying normal and deficient motivation, as well as treatment effects. For instance, dopamine agonists appeared to increase reward attractiveness, whereas serotonin reuptake inhibitors seemed to alleviate effort costs.
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.