Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T04:33:37.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

W-22. Workshop: Semiotic between neuro-myths and social romanticism — part II Semiotics and social psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Abstract

Type
Social Psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2005

Chairperson(s): Hans Pfefferer-Wolf (Hannover, Germany) 08.30 - 10.00, Holiday Inn - Room 6

Semiotic is the science of sign processes which means processes like communication, discussion, measurement, research and construction of theories in which signs am involved. According to its own understanding semiotic as an object- and meta-science tries to establish links between different scientific disciplines. It is obvious to illustrate these links on "creating of myths" in scientific statements not having an empirical base. The workshop "Neuro-Myths and Social Romanticism" continues a complex tradition of critical distance towards neuro-sciences and social psychiatry. A brief survey about some controverse discussed claims will be given (S. Debus): first towards the neuro-sciences, which do not realize the "identity of the ego", as long as they refer to inadequate mechanical models, second towards social psychiatry which degrades the body to an epiphenomenon and compensates the non-suitability of its social-psychomodels by pure social actionism. The following critical and selfcritical contributions give a comment on the process of scientific creating of myth from different points of view: from a semiotic view (R. Posner), from a clinical-psychialric view (A. Heinz), from a socialpsychiatric view (H. Pfefferer-Wolf) and from a philosophical view (G. Schulte). The workshop will be held in 2 following parts, 90 minutes each: Workshop I: Semiotics and Neuro-Sciences Workshop II: Semiotics and Social Psychiatry

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.