Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:17:13.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards an individual treatment in alcoholism: Project predict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

K.F. Mann
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
M. Smolka
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A. Diehl
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
U. Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
A. Heinz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Berlin, Charite, Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Previous attempts to identify predictors for the treatment response in alcoholism have mainly concentrated on social and personality variables. Project MATCH was such an attempt which finally failed. The same holds true for similar attempts in pharmacotherapy. Therefore, we set out for a large oligocentre trial “Project PREDICT”. 432 patients are randomly assigned to treatment with acamprosate, naltrexone or placebo. At baseline patients are assessed with a battery of interviews, questionnaires and biological examinations (e.g. genetics). Specific emphasis is put on patients' individual pathways into relapse. It is determined whether relapse drinking respresented a positive reinforcer (“reward craving”) or a negative reinforcer (“relief craving”). This is assessed with questionnaires, the startle reflex and fMRI. We hypothesize, that patients who are a priori identified as “positive reinforcers” better respond to naltrexone. Negative reinforcers should benefit most from acamprosate.

All patients have been included by now. Preliminary analyses suggest that it seems indeed possible to distinguish between the two craving types. The equivalent of positive reinforcement in the startle reflex correlates with fMRI responses to cues with a positive valence of about 0.7. These methods might offer a platform for a targeted pharmacotherapy in alcoholism.

Type
S17. Symposium: Addiction Treatment and Research: New Strategies and Future Perspectives
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.