Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:05:37.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward and self-consciousness as predictors of the referential thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M.C. Senín-Calderón
Affiliation:
Servicio de Atención Psicológica y Psicopedagógica, Universidad de Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
J.F. Rodríguez-Testal
Affiliation:
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
E. Fernández-Jiménez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
M. Valdés-Diaz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
M.D.M. Benítez-Hernández
Affiliation:
Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
S. Fuentes-Márquez
Affiliation:
Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Antecedents

In previous works, referential thinking was predicted by clinical and dispositional variables such as social anxiety or vulnerability to depression (Rodríguez-Testal, Senín-Calderón & Fernández-Jiménez, submitted to revision).

Objectives and hypotheses

We propose to find personality variables to characterize the emergence of referential thinking. We predict a greater referential thinking in subjects with a high sensitivity to punishment and higher scores on social anxiety.

Methods

Participants: 366 subjects selected from the general population, 66.6% women, mean age = 33.18 (SD = 12.79).

Materials

We used the REF-scale (Lenzenweger et al., 1997) adapted to Spanish language, GHQ-28 (Goldberg, 1996), SPSRQ (Torrubia et al., 2001) and The Revised Self-Consciousness Scale (Scheier & Carver, 1985).

It was applied a cross-sectional design and a correlation method. All the analysis were accepted at p < .05.

Results

The multiple linear regression analysis showed the importance of the clinical variable of depression, public self-consciousness, and sensitivity to reward and punishment as predictors of referential thinking (34% of the variance explained). The discriminant analysis according to scores in referential thinking was significant (Lambda = .87, p = .001). The combination of the above variables correctly classified 85.1% of cases.

Conclusions

Subjects more concerned about how they are perceived by others tend to a greater presence of self-references, although they don’t show a high score in social anxiety. Susceptibility to reward and high vulnerable to punishment are the personality variables that best predicted referential thinking.

Type
P03-44
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.