Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:30:07.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schizophrenia, the prefrontal cortex, and a mechanism of genetic susceptibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

D.R. Weinberger*
Affiliation:
Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland20892, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: WeinberD@INTRA.NIMH.nih.gov
Get access

Summary

Information-processing in the prefrontal cortex is abnormal in patients with schizophrenia. From functional neuroimaging and other studies, it appears that neurons of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are effectors of core clinical and biological phenomena associated with the illness. Cognitive deficits qualitatively similar to those in patients with schizophrenia are also found in their healthy siblings and other relatives. The evidence for abnormal prefrontal function in healthy siblings suggests that the deficit in information-processing is part of the biology of genetic susceptibility. Therefore, genetic variations in human DNA that affect this kind of information-processing may contribute part of the genetic risk for the illness. COMT is an enzyme that is distributed widely throughout the brain, but seems to be uniquely relevant to how dopamine affects information-processing in the prefrontal cortex. There is a common variation in the genetic sequence of the COMT gene, which causes a dramatic change in its enzyme activity. In people with schizophrenia, in their healthy siblings, and also in normal controls, the COMT genotype predicts 4% of the variation in human executive cognition and working memory. We have thus identified a genetic mechanism in the human species that affects the efficiency and efficacy of information-processing in the prefrontal cortex. It is, also, a weak genetic risk factor for schizophrenia: in family studies, it increases the risk of schizophrenia by 50-80%. Prefrontal neuronal tuning may be a target for new drug development in the future.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertolino, AEsposito, GCallicott, JHMattay, VSVan Horn, JDFrank, JA et al. Specific relationship between prefrontal neuronal N–acetylaspartate and activation of the working memory cortical network in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000;15:2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolino, ABreier, ACallicott, JHAdler, CMattay, VSShapiro, M et al. The relationship between dorsolateral prefrontal neuronal N–acetylaspartate and evoked release of striatal dopamine in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2000;2:12532.Google Scholar
Breier, ASu, TPSaunders, RCarson, REKolachana, BSde Bartolomeis, A et al. Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: evidence from a novel positron emission tomography method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;9:2569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, JHBertolino, AEgan, MFMattay, VSLangheim, FJWeinberger, DR. Selective relationship between prefrontal N–acetylaspartate measures and negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000;15:1646–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, JHBertolino, AMattay, VSLangheim, FJDuyn, JCoppola, R et al. Physiological dysfunction of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia revisited. Cereb Cortex 2000;1:1078–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, MFGlodberg, TEKolachana, BSCallicott, JHMazzanti, CMStraub, RE et al. Effect of COMT Val108/158Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:917–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, WJKrimer, LSGoldman-Rakic, PS.Presynaptic regulation of recurrent excitation by D1 receptors in prefrontal circuits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:295300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurden, HTassin, JPJay, TM.Integrity of the mesocortical dopaminergic system is necessary for complete expression of in vivo hippocampal–prefrontal cortex long-term potentiation. Neuroscience 1999;94:1019–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, BGKlivenyi, PKustermann, EAndreassen, OAFerrante, RJRosen, BR et al. Nonlinear decrease over time in N–acetyl aspartate levels in the absence of neuronal loss and increases in glutamine and glucose in transgenic Huntington’s disease mice. J Neurochem 2000;74:2108–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffett, JRNamboodiri, MA.Differential distribution of N–acetylaspartylglutamate and N–acetylaspartate immunoreactivities in rat forebrain J Neurocytol 1995;24:409–33.Google Scholar
Seamans, JDurstewitz, DChriste, BRStevens, CFSejnowski, TJ.DopamineD1/D5receptor modulation of excitatory synaptic inputs to layer V prefrontal cortex neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;9:301–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, MBloom, FE.The Action of Norepinephrine in the Rat Hippocampus. III. Hippocampal Cellular Reponses to Locus Coeruleus Stimulation in the Awake Rat. Brain Research 1976;107:499511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sesack, SRHawrylak, VAMatus, CGuido, MALevey, AI.Dopamine axon varicosities in the prelimbic division of the rat prefrontal cortex exhibit sparse immunoreactivity for the dopamine transporter. J Neurosci 1998;1:2697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urenjak, JWilliams, SRGadian, DGNoble, M.Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy unambiguously identifies different neural cell types. J Neurosci 1993;13:981–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weickert, TWGoldberg, TEGold, JMBigelow, LBEgan, MFWeinberger, DR.Cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia displaying preserved and compromised intellect. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;5:907–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, GVGoldman-Rakic, PS.Modulation of memory fields by dopamine D1 receptors in prefrontal cortex. Nature 1995;376:572–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.