Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:33:35.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schizophrenia -end of classical dopamine theory? what” s next?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

A. Mititelu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience Research, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Schizophrenia (SZ) remains the most challenging psychiatric pathology at moment despite huge efforts made with the scope to achieve a clear better understanding of its etiology and pathophysiology. at least 1% of world populations suffers from this disease.

Objective

An avalanche of recent studies reveals the massive importance of glutamate abnormalities which appear in the debut phases and contribute essentially to the further development of severe symptoms. Old, classical and peculiar dopamine hypothesis starts day by day to become less feasible.

Aims

Based on a better understanding will be more efficient to develop more efficient therapeutic products. Based on more accuracy and real understanding of GABA and Glutamate roles in the pathophysiology of SZ is possible for staring more efficient therapies

Methods

In this sense we realised a thematical research study from vast bibliographical resources.between 2000–2009 all basic research and clinic-pathological studies, indexed on Pubmed, Medline and Wiley Science Library had been reviewed.

Results

Simple mechanical appreciation shows, unfortunately, that at moment dopamine theory still dominates the etio-pathology of this major psychiatric syndrome. In fact dopamine variations are secondary to glutamate dysfunctions. We don’t need to forget that most of actual treatments-second generation of antipsychotics- had been produced on basis of dopamine hyperfunction theory. The importance of glutamate and GABA deficiencies, which offer a more clear and logical explanation of pathology seen in SZ, cannot be considered as secondary to hypodopaminergic frontality or to hyperdopaminergic inputs from nucleus accumbens.

Type
P03-283
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.