Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T17:12:48.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

S20.02 - Effect of outcome monitoring and management in German inpatient psychiatric care: Cluster-randomised trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

B. Puschner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany
D. Schöfer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany
C. Knaup
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany
T. Becker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Günzburg, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and Aims:

Outcome management has been suggested as a promising strategy to improve quality of mental health care. However, there is a lack of evidence on the efficacy of feedback of treatment outcome to people with severe mental disorder and their clinicians. Thus, the study "Outcome monitoring and outcome management in inpatient psychiatric care" (EMM) aims to to ascertain the short- and mid-term effect of outcome management in inpatient psychiatric care.

Method:

This cluster-randmised trial started in June 2005. 294 participants who gave informed consent have been recruited among patients admitted to a large psychiatric hospital in rural Bavaria. These were asked to provide information on treatment outcome on the Outcome Questionnaire 45 via weekly computerised assessments. Patients and clinicians in the intervention group received continuous feedback of outcome.

Results:

Patients were willing and able to provide outcome data on a regular basis. Patients highly valued feedback of outcome while clinician acceptance was moderate. At discharge, there were no differences between the feedback and no-feedback groups on patient-rated outcome. However, as compared to the no-feedback group, length of stay of patients with good outcome who received feedback was shorter while it was longer for those with unfavorable outcome. Further findings on the mid-term effect of feedback at follow-up and on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention will be reported.

Conclusions:

Implications of these results for further improving the effectiveness of outcome management in mental health services and thus contributing to an adaptive allocation of treatment resources will be discussed.

Type
Symposium: Mental health outcome assessment and feedback: An international perspective
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.