Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T18:16:31.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revisiting the approaches of psychotherapy in Ayurveda with Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

W. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
1Centre Ahimsa, Verrières-le-Buisson, France
A. Iyer
Affiliation:
2Independent and unaffiliated researcher, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Recently there have been increased acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine (including traditional medicines) not only among laypersons but also various medical specialities. Ayurveda is one such, that originated at least in 3000 BC in the Indian subcontinent. Ayurveda aims at not only treating diseases but also maintaining optimum health. Psychiatry branch of Ayurveda recommends the use of both medicines and psychotherapy. Past papers on Ayurvedic psychotherapy have limitations in terms of semantics, conveying relevance and practical implementation. To tide over such limitations, we review concepts of psychotherapy in the Ayurveda texts Charaka Samhita (CS), Sushruta Samhita (SS), Ashtanga Hridaya (AH) and their commentaries from the original Sanskrit texts, in light of RDoC framework. The approaches derived can be used not just for therapy but also as mental health promotion.

Objectives

  1. 1. To delineate approaches to psychotherapy from Ayurveda classics and their commentaries, which are useful for both mental health promotion and therapy.

  2. 2. To view the components of Ayurvedic psychotherapy approaches in terms of RDoC constructs/subconstructs.

Methods

Relevant chapters were scanned in the texts CS, SS, AH and their commentaries for descriptions of psychotherapy. Consequently, its components were compared with the definitions of constructs and subconstructs of RDoC to identify similarities.

Results

Only CS and AH had descriptions on psychotherapy, among which, one out of the four described in CS and the only one in AH was suitable for our purpose. The components of these models with relevant counterparts (single or combined) are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1

CS psychotherapy modelRDoC construct/ subconstruct
1)    Spiritual awareness (Jnana)Declarative memory (semantic)
2)    Specialised knowledge (Vijnana)Declarative memory (semantic)
3)    Self-control & equanimity (Dhairya)Cognitive control
4)    Memory (Smriti)Declarative memory (episodic)
5)    Meditative focus (Samadhi)Attention, working memory
AH psychotherapy modelRDoC construct/ subconstruct
1)    Intellect (Dhi)Declarative memory.
2)    Self-control (Dhairya)Cognitive control
3)    Knowledge of self and surrounding (Atmadi jnana)Perception and understanding of self

Conclusions

Thus, CS and AH provide a 5-dimensional and a 3-dimensional approach to psychotherapy respectively (with its components having correlates with few RDoC constructs or subconstructs) which can be explored clinically and evaluated, for therapy and mental health promotion purposes.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.