Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-26vmc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:19:43.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying contributions for anxiety variability in adolescence: “Missing parts” of the phenotype definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

G.A. Salum
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre National Institute for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, São Paulo, Brazil
G.G. Manfro
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre National Institute for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Although several risk factors for anxiety-related phenotypes have been identified, few studies have quantified the weight of each one of these factors.

Objective/aim

The aim of this study is to quantify contributions for anxiety variance in adolescents.

Methods

Ninety-seven adolescents from a community cross-sectional study and their parents were assessed with a structured DSM-IV diagnostic interview, several psychiatric and environmental rating scales and with a nutritional evaluation. The whole evaluation protocol generates 31 constructs previously associated with anxiety-related phenotypes in the literature. These constructs were organized in a hierarchical block analysis as follows:

  1. (1) socio-demographic and early life environment;

  2. (2) family environment and maternal psychiatric symptomatology and temperament;

  3. (3) stressfull life-events and maltreatment;

  4. (4) physical health and nutrition. The Screen for Children and Adolescent Related Anxiety Disorders (SCARED) was used as outcome.

Results

The results of our hierarchical model accounts for only 24% of the total SCARED score. Hierarchically, block one and two did not explain significantly the SCARED variability (r2 = 0.078; p = 0.011 and r2=0.106; p = 0.064/pincremental = 0.090). After the inclusion of block 3, the hierarchical model achieved statistical significance (r2 = 0.231; p = 0.001/pincremental = 0.001), with little additional explanation after the inclusion of block 4 (r2 = 0.243; p = 0.001/pincremental = 0.242).

Conclusion

Even after an extensive exploratory analysis we were able to explain only about one fourth of anxiety symptoms variability in adolescents. Our findings support the notion that we still have a distant comprehension of the factors that lead to anxiety in adolescents and that the major determinants of anxiety disorders in adolescence are still missing.

Type
P01-174
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.