No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Psychotic experiences in university students: prevalence, correlates and association with non-specific psychological distress
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction
Subclinical psychotic experiences (PEs) are far more prevalent than psychotic disorders, with an estimated prevalence of 7.2% (Linscott & Van Os. Psychol Med 2013;43(6) 1133-1149). PEs are particularly prevalent in late adolescence and young adulthood, when obtaining academic education is one of the main developmental tasks. University students are at the peak age of onset of mental disorders, and often experience high levels of social and academic stress that may contribute to the onset of psychopathology. Hence, estimating the prevalence and correlates of PEs among university students is particularly important.
Objectives
To estimate the prevalence of PEs in a sample of Israeli students; assess whether rates of PEs differ by selected sociodemographic characteristics; and examine the association between PEs and non-specific psychological distress.
Methods
150 students from universities and colleges in Israel participated in a cross-sectional online survey. All students were over the age of 18 and were not diagnosed with psychotic disorders. Participants completed self-report questionnaires, including the Prodromal Questionnaire - Brief Version (PQ-B), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and sociodemographic details. The PQ-B yields a score for the total number of items endorsed (range 0–21), and a total distress score (range 0–105). A cutoff of ≥8 distressing symptoms was used to identify participants at high-risk for psychosis.
Results
21 participants (14.0%) reported 8 or more distressing PEs. PEs were more common in males and among those with a psychiatric illness (Table 1). PEs were not associated with marital status, religiosity, or immigrant status. While a greater number of PEs was positively associated with non-specific psychological distress (r=0.589, p<.001), there was no association between distress caused by PEs and non-specific psychological distress (r=0.145, NS).Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics by group
| PEs- | PEs+ | X2, p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | M | 29.5% | 52.4% | 4.32, .038 |
| F | 70.5% | 47.6% | ||
| Marital Status | Married | 17.1% | 23.8% | 0.56, NS |
| Unmarried | 82.9% | 76.2% | ||
| Immigrant | No | 89.9% | 85.7% | 0.34, NS |
| Yes | 10.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Religiosity | Secular | 74.4% | 57.1% | 2.67, NS |
| Other | 25.6% | 42.9% | ||
| Psychiatricillness | No | 87.6% | 61.9% | 8.87, .003 |
| Yes | 12.4% | 38.1% | ||
Conclusions
The findings confirm that self-reported PEs are much more prevalent than clinically diagnosed psychotic disorders, particularly among young adults. As PEs were found to be associated with non-specific psychological distress, and as they are known forerunners for severe mental disorders, it is important to address mental health issues in school settings and promote prevention and early intervention programs.
Disclosure of Interest
None Declared
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 67 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 32nd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2024 , pp. S214
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
You have
Access
Open access
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.