Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-5fx6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:03:25.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P0078 - Hindsight bias in psychiatrists' diagnoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M. Arbabi
Affiliation:
Psychiatric and Psychological Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
B. Mostafazade Davani
Affiliation:
Education Development Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
A.A. Nejatisafa
Affiliation:
Psychiatric and Psychological Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
M. Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Psychiatric and Psychological Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
S. Mortaz
Affiliation:
Education Development Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
H. Parsafar
Affiliation:
Psychiatric and Psychological Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Hindsight bias means knowing the outcome may profoundly influence the perception of past events and prevent a realistic appraisal of what actually occurred.

Aims:

To evaluate the role of hindsight bias on psychiatrists' diagnosis.

Methods:

A psychiatric vignette was made, and validated by expert psychiatrists in national board of psychiatry. They defined the most probable (Bipolar Mood Disorder) and the least probable diagnosis (Schizoaffective disorder). We designed three types of questionnaire, Type A: the basic vignette with an additional explain that in pervious admission the diagnosis was Schizoaffective disorder, Type B: the basic vignette with a suggestion of Bipolar mood disorder, and Type C: the basic vignette without any suggestion. These three forms were sent out to psychiatrists by randomization and concealment allocation in three groups to evaluate their diagnosis.

Results:

Of the 240 psychiatrists included,173 persons responded (response rate 72%).There were 52 persons in group A with Schizoaffective disorder suggestion, 63 in group B with Bipolar mood disorder suggestion and 58 in the control group. There was a significant increase of schizoaffective disorder diagnosis (Pv <0.001) but there was not a significant difference for Bipolar Mood Disorder or any other diagnoses. There was no difference in mean age, sex and duration of clinical practice between groups.

Conclusion:

According to this study decision-making in psychiatry may be vulnerable to biases like hindsight bias. Insight via education appears the major means to avoid distorting decision-making processes.

Type
Poster Session III: Diagnoses And Classification
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.