Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:49:10.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neuroendocrine responsivity to clomipramine challenge test in neuroleptic naive psychotic patients before and after treatment with haloperidol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

E Angelopoulos
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, Psychiatric Clinic, Eginition Hospital, Vas Sophias 74, Athens11528, Greece
M Markianos*
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, Psychiatric Clinic, Eginition Hospital, Vas Sophias 74, Athens11528, Greece
E Daskalopoulou
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, Psychiatric Clinic, Eginition Hospital, Vas Sophias 74, Athens11528, Greece
J Tzemos
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, Psychiatric Clinic, Eginition Hospital, Vas Sophias 74, Athens11528, Greece
C Stefanis
Affiliation:
Athens University Medical School, Psychiatric Clinic, Eginition Hospital, Vas Sophias 74, Athens11528, Greece
*
*Correspondence and reprints.
Get access

Summary

The prolactin, cortisol and growth hormone (GH) responses to intravenous administration of 25 mg clomipramine (CMI) were studied in young male psychotic patients who had never received neuroleptics and suffered from schizophrenia (13 patients), delusional disorder (three patients) or schizoaffective disorder (one patient). The test was repeated after 1 month in 16 patients who were hospitalized and treated with haloperidol in doses appropriate for best clinical response (range: 7.5–40 mg daily). Symptomatology was assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). There was no association of the side effects caused by the administration of CMI (nausea and emesis) to the GH responses. The side effects appeared significantly less in the after treatment trials. Treatment with haloperidol did not influence the response patterns of the three hormones. An indication that high haloperidol doses may inhibit the prolactin response to CMI was obtained when the data were compared between low (7.5–10 mg/day, mean 9.7) and high (15–40 mg/day, mean 22.0) dose subgroups. Significant positive correlations were found between the prolactin and cortisol responses to CMI in the drug-free state, and the scores in the positive symptoms subscale of the BPRS. The degree of improvement did not correlate to any of the hormonal data.

Type
Original articles
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altar, CA, Wasley, AM, Neale, RF, Stone, GA. Typical and atypical antipsychotic occupance of D2 and S2 receptors: an autoradiographic analysis in rat brain. Brain Res Bull 1986; 16: 517525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, IM, Ware, CJ, da Rosa-Davis, JM, Cowen, PJ. Decreased 5-HT-mediated prolactin release in major depression. Br J Psychiatry 1992; 160: 372378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breir, A. Serotonin, schizophrenia and antipsychotic drug action. Schizophr Res 1995; 14: 187202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunello, N, Masotto, C, Steardo, L, Markstein, R, Racagni, G. New insights into the biology of schizophrenia through the mechanism of action of clozapine. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996; 13: 177213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canton, H, Verriele, L, Colpaert, FC. Binding of typical and atypical antipsychotics to 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 sites: clozapine potently interacts with 5-HT1c sites. Eur J Pharmacol 1990; 191: 9396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, RN, Hsiao, J, Lane, E, Hicks, R, Rogers, S, Potter, WZ. The effects of intravenous clomipramine on neurohormones in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 68: 632637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golden, RN, Hsiao, JK, Lane, E, Ekstrom, D, Rogers, S, Hicks, Ret al. Abnormal neuroendocrine responsivity to acute iv clomipramine challenge in depressed patients. Psychiatry Res 1990; 31: 3947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenshaw, AJ. Behavioural pharmacology of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists: a critical update on therapeutic potential. Trends Pharm Sci 1993; 14: 265270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, J, Honigfeld, G, Singer, J, Meltzer, HClozaril Collaborative Study Group. Clozapine for the treatment-resistent schizophrenic: A double-blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 789796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krystal, JH, Seibyl, JP, Price, LH, Woods, SW, Heninger, GR, Aghanian, GKet al. m-Chlorophenylpiperazine effects in neuroleptic-free schizophrenic patients: evidence implicating serotonergic systems in positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 258263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laakmann, G, Gugath, M, Kuss, HJ, Zygan, K. Comparison of growth hormone and prolactin stimulation induced by clomipramine and desimipramine in man in connection with chlorimipramine metabolism. Psychopharmacology 1984; 82: 6267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laferrere, B, Wurtman, RJ. Effects of fenfluramine on serotonin release in brains of anaesthesized rats. Brain Res 1989; 504: 258263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, BD, Glynn, SM, Midha, KK, Hubbard, JW, Bowen, LL, Banzett, Let al. Adverse effects of fenfluramine in treatment refractory schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1989; 9: 110115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meltzer, HY. Clinical studies on the mechanism of action of clozapine: the dopamine-serotonin hypothesis of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology 1989; 99: S18S27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, IR, Chapman, JE, Neufeld, RWJ. Variability in BPRS definitions of positive and negative symptoms. Schizophr Res 1995; 17: 177185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peroutka, SJ, Snyder, SH. Relationship of neuroleptic drug effects at brain dopamine, serotonin, alpha-adrenergic, and histamine receptors to clinical potence. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137: 15181522Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.