Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T16:03:49.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term prediction of multidimensional social inclusion among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

J. Hao*
Affiliation:
1Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen
N. Tiles-Sar
Affiliation:
1Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen
L. van der Meer
Affiliation:
2Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 3Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren
R. Bruggeman
Affiliation:
2Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen 4Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
B. Z. Alizadeh
Affiliation:
1Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Poor social inclusion, as a cause and consequence simultaneously, has been associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). It can bring a substantial burden to individual families and the society. Previous studies lack 1) the quantitative exploration of (multidimensional) social inclusion which can enable the measurement and monitor of the level of social integration, 2) longitudinal and multivariate study designs, and 3) methodological comparison between the traditional and data-driven approaches for a better clinical suitability of monitoring and managing social inclusion.

Objectives

To build and compare 3-year models predictive of multidimensional social inclusion (mSI) among the SSD patients, using standard and data-driven approaches.

Methods

We used the baseline and 3-year follow-up data of 1,119 patients from the Genetic Risk and Outcome in Psychosis. Social functioning (Social Functioning Scale, SFS) and quality of life (the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life, WHOQOL-BREF) were used as a proxy of mSI. K-means clustering over the 13 subscales of SFS and WHOQOL-BREF was applied to identify mSI subgroups. Prediction models were built and internally validated via multinomial logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF). The MLR and RF model performance was compared by accuracy and the discriminability of mSI subgroups (i.e., p-value of one-sided binomial test between the accuracy and no information rate).

Results

Five mSI groups were identified: 1) “very low (in SFS)/very low (in WHOQOL-BREF)” (8.58%), 2) “low/low” (12.87%), 3) “high/low” (49.24%), 4) “medium/high” (18.05%), and 5) “high/high” (11.26%). Both MLR and RF models included 22 predictors and demonstrated accuracies of 59.16% (95CI%: [55.75%, 62.58%], p = 0.994) and 61.61% (95%CI: [54.90%, 68.01%], p = 0.013) correspondingly. The mSI was robustly and mainly and robustly predicted by genetic predisposition, premorbid social functioning, symptoms (i.e., positive, negative and depressive), number of met needs and baseline satisfaction with the environment and social life.

Image:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Conclusions

Notwithstanding comparable accuracies, we cautiously consider the RF model outperforming primarily due to its better discriminability. As the baseline conditions of the patients with SSD could indicate the 3-year mSI level, customized amount and types of resources and interventions can be designed to improve the level of multidimensional social inclusion of all SSD patients.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.