Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:00:17.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Latent profiles for mental health in older people from Concepción, Chile.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

S. Saldivia*
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry and Mental Health
J. Aslan-Parra
Affiliation:
2Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile
C. Bustos
Affiliation:
3Psychology
C. Inostroza
Affiliation:
3Psychology
F. Cova
Affiliation:
3Psychology
A. Castillo
Affiliation:
4Fundamentos de Enfermería y Salud Pública, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepción, Chile
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Aging is a demographic global trend and a challenge for public mental health; however, gaps persist for a comprehensive definition of mental health, risk, protective factors, and processes involved, which represent a greater problem in middle-income countries, where evidence is scarce.

Objectives

To identify combined mental health profiles in older adults, based on self-report of anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and perception of well-being, and to identify risk and protective variables for each of the groups, based on a sample of older adults attending primary health care (PHC) centers in the Province of Concepción, Chile.

Methods

A convenience sample of 573 adults of both sexes, over 65 years, autonomous, attending PHC centers in the Province of Concepción, Chile, answered a set of instruments assessing anxiety symptoms (SCL-90), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) and perception of well-being (Pemberton Happiness Index) and eventually associated variables that included sociodemographic and living arrangements, social participation, threatening life events (LTE), loneliness (ULS-3), and social support (MSPSS). Latent profile mixture analysis was used to identify groups of adults with similar mental health, and pertinence in each group was explained using random forests. The relationship between predictors and latent profiles were analyzed with multinomial regression.

Results

A solution of 4 groups with distinctive mental health profiles was determined: Group 1 (28%) with high depressive symptoms, high anxiety, and low well-being; Group 2 (32%) with moderate depressive symptoms, high anxiety and moderate well-being; Group 3 (24%) with moderate depressive symptoms, low anxiety and moderate well-being and; Group 4 (15%) characterized by individuals with low anxious or depressive symptoms, high well-being, and absence of mental disorder.

Using random forests, this model predicts 63% variance between groups. A large number of variables were found to significantly predict membership in one of the 4 groups. Specifically: gender, satisfaction with living arrangement, economic crisis, own disease, and death or illness of friend, perception of general health, intimate, relational and collective loneliness, social support from family and significant others, and social support from friends.

Conclusions

The 4-group classification is a parsimonious solution where group 1 characterize people with poor mental health; groups 2 and 3 languishing with high and low anxiety respectively; and group 4 healthy and flourishing. Overall, these groups highlight the role of close interpersonal relationships or primary ties, both in terms of intimacy versus loneliness/isolation and in satisfaction with living arrangements for the elderly. The importance of these psychosocial predictors on combined mental health in the elderly further the need to understand their role and mechanisms to design promotion and prevention strategies.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.