Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:22:41.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1671 – Diagnosing Schizophrenia Using Neuroimaging: A Meta-analysis of Multivariate Pattern Recognition Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

J. Kambeitz
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany
L. Kambeitz-Ilankovic
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, München, Germany
S. Leucht
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Technical University Munich, München, Germany
S. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
C. Davatzikos
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Section of Biomedical Image Analysis Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania, USA
B. Malchow
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Department of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
P. Falkai
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Department of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
N. Koutsouleris
Affiliation:
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Department of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Numerous studies have applied novel multivariate statistical approaches to the analysis of brain alterations in patients with schizophrenia. However the diagnostic accuracy of the reported predictive models differs largely, making it difficult to evaluate the overall potential of these studies to inform clinical diagnosis.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify all studies reporting performance of neuroimaging-based multivariate predictive models for the differentiation of patients with schizophrenia from healthy control subjects. The robustness of the results as well as the effect of potentially confounding continous variables (e.g. age, gender ratio, year of publication) was investigated.

Results

The final sample consisted of n=37 studies studies including n=1491 patients with schizophrenia and n=1488 healthy controls. Metaanalysis of the complete sample showed a sensitivity of 80.7% (95%-CI: 77.0 to 83.9%) and a specificity of 80.2% (95%-CI: 83.3 to 76.7%). Separate analysis for the different imaging modalities showed similar diagnostic accuracy for the structural MRI studies (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 78.7%), the fMRI studies (sensitivity 81.4%, specificity 82.4%) and resting-state fMRI studies (sensitivity 86.9%, specificity 80.3%). Moderator analysis showed significant effects of age of patients on sensitivity (p=0.021) and of positive-tonegative symptom ratio on specificity (p=0.028) indicating better diagnostic accuracy in older patients and patients with positive symptoms.

Discussion

Our analysis indicate an overall sensitivity and overall specificity of around 80 % of neuroimaging-based predictive models for differentiating schizophrenic patients from healthy controls. The results underline the potential applicability of neuroimaging-based predictive models for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Type
E01 - e-Poster Oral Session 01: Schizophrenia
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.