No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Emotion dysregulation in adolescents: the associations with clinical symptoms, risky-behaviors, and environmental factors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction
Emotion dysregulation (ED) is transdiagnostic domain that plays a pivotal role in the emergence and persistence of numerous mental disorders. Examining the extent of ED within non-clinical populations may shed light on whether ED is indeed linked to symptoms as observed in clinical settings. This investigation constitutes a crucial milestone toward the development of preventive strategies.
Objectives
To investigate the correlations between ED, psychopathological symptoms, risky behaviors, and environmental factors in adolescent students.
Methods
A total of N=610 students (16 years; 72% females) completed self-report standardized questionnaires measuring depression, anxiety, impulsivity, childhood trauma, relations with classmates, and family functioning. Lifetime risky-behaviours were recorded using an ad-hoc checklist, and ED through Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). The sample was then divided into subgroups based on percentiles of DERS Total scores: N=210 low ED, N=187 moderate, N=214 high.
Results
Table 2.
Table 3.
Participants exhibiting high ED displayed higher level of depression, anxiety and impulsivity (Table 1). There was an observable trend linking higher levels of ED with a greater proportion of youths reporting risky behaviors (Table 2). The high ED group reported an increased frequency of childhood traumatic experiences, less favorable relationships with family members and classmates (Table 3).Table 1.
Clinical symptoms by level of ED in students (N=610)
| low | moderate | high | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire (depression) | 5.33(±3.51) | 8.94(±4.05) | 14.57(±5.53) | <.001 |
| Screen For Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (anxiety) | 59.27(±9.61) | 68.61(±10.88) | 79.39(±11.61) | <.001 |
| Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief (impulsivity) | 15.14(±3.52) | 16.70(±3.81) | 18.01(±4.17) | <.001 |
Risky behaviors by level of ED in students (N=610)
| low | moderate | high | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking | N=73 (29.6%) | N=78 (31.6%) | N=96 (38.9%) | .097 |
| Self-harm ideation | N=35 (13.4%) | N=73 (28%) | N=153 (58.6%) | <.001 |
| Self-harm | N=30 (15%) | N=49 (24.5%) | N=121 (60.5%) | <.001 |
| Binge eating | N=60 (22.9%) | N=78 (29.8%) | N=124 (47.3%) | <.001 |
Environmental factors by level of ED in students (N=610)
| low | moderate | high | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (trauma) | 30.99(±6.89) | 35.39(±9.1) | 39.54(±10.94) | <.001 |
| Child And Adolescent Social Support Scale (classmate) | 51.19(±11.7) | 46.55(±10.96) | 44.91(±12.4) | <.001 |
| Family Assessment Device (family functioning) | 117.58(±14) | 108.8(±17.48) | 103.38(±20.11) | <.001 |
Conclusions
Findings provide robust support for the association between ED and compromised personal functioning, even within a non-clinical sample. The trend observed in the relationship between ED, clinical symptoms and risky behaviors is consistent across all variables. Overall, these results contribute to the growing body of evidence advocating for preventive interventions aimed at addressing ED in adolescents.
Disclosure of Interest
None Declared
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 67 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 32nd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2024 , pp. S452
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
You have
Access
Open access
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.