Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T12:55:11.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of symptoms on the assessment of social functioning: comparison between Axis V of DSM III-R and the Psychosocial Aptitude Rating Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P Robert ,
V Aubin ,
M Dumarcet ,
T Braccini ,
E Souêtre  and
G Darcourt
P Robert
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
V Aubin
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
M Dumarcet
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
T Braccini
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
E Souêtre
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
G Darcourt
Affiliation:
Clinique de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, Hôpital Pasteur, BP 69, 06002, Nice Cedex, France
Get access

Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate relationships and differences between 2 scales assessing subject’s adaptative functioning. On the one hand, Axis V in the revised version of the Third Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM III-R) includes specific symptoms for each level of functioning described. On the other hand, the Psychosocial Aptitude Rating Scale (PARS) does not include clinical symptoms. A total of 78 psychiatric inpatients were rated independently with the 2 scales. The 2 ratings were correlated for the whole sample and for each diagnostic category. Diagnosis (Axis 1) explained 63.9% of the variance in the Global Assessment Functioning (GAF) Scale (Axis V) and only 23.8% in the Psychosocial Aptitude Rating Scale (PARS). Axis V is then made redundant by Axis 1 which is contrary to the aim of a multi-axial system. PARS describes aspects of the disorder that are distinct from clinical symptoms. These occupational and social aspects may be of great interest for a better overall evaluation of severity of mental disorders.

Keywords

adaptative behaviorAxis VPsychosocial Aptitude Rating Scale
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 1991 , pp. 67 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rdEdn: French Translation, 1983 (Pichot, PGuelfi, JDet al, eds) Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rdEdn Revised: French Transl, 1989 (Guelfi, JDet al, eds) Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
Darcourt, GRobert, PVitali, Ρ (1986) À propos de la création d'une échelle d’aptitude psychosociale.In Comptes rendus du congrès de psychiatrie et de neurologie de langue française, 83e session, Besançon. Masson, Paris, 227–229Google Scholar
Endicott, JSpitzer, RLFleiss, JLet al (1976) The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33, 766–771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, TMellsop, GNelson, K (1976) The reliability of Axis V of DSM III. Am J Psychiatry 143, 752–755Google Scholar
Gordon, REJardiolin, PGordon, KK (1985) Predicting length of hospital stay of psychiatric patients. Am J Psychiatry 142, 235–237Google ScholarPubMed
Mezzich, JEEvanczuk, KJMathias, RJ (1984) Admission decisions and multi-axial diagnosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 41, 1001–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzich, ACMezzich, JECoffman, GA (1985) Reliability of DSM III vs DSM II in child psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 24, 273–280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert, PBraccini, ΤVitali, PDarcourt, G (1987) Échelle d’aptitude psychosociale, présentation et validation. Psychol Méd 19 (10), 1761–1765Google Scholar
Robert, PBraccini, ΤVitali, ΡAubin, VDumarcet, MDarcourt, G (1988) Psychosocial aptitude rating scale and psychoses.Paper presented at the World Psychiatric Association, Regional Symposium, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Skodol, AELink, BGShrout, PEHorwath, EThe revision of Axis V in DSM III-R: should symptoms have been included? Am J Psychiatry 145, 825–829Google Scholar
Williams, JBW (1985) The multi-axial system of DSM III: where dit it come from and where should it go? II: Empirical studies, innovations and recommendations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42, 181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.