Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:23:26.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences of use between paliperidone palmitate 3 month and paliperidone palmitate 1 month in real practice, with psychotic patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

P. Escobedo-Aedo*
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
J. Merayo-Cano
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
L. Mata Iturralde
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
L. Muñoz Lorenzo
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
S. Ovejero
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
S. Sánchez Alonso
Affiliation:
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Paliperidone palmitate 1-month (PP1M) is a Long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulation, approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Recently, paliperidone palmitate 3-months (PP3M) formulation was introduced, which maintains stability while offering a longer dosing interval for the maintenance treatment in patients previously treated with PP1M. Despite of this, many patients are treated with PP1M without transition to PP3M.

Objectives

To identify variables explaining maintenance of PP1M treatment instead of going to PP3M. We hypothesize that more severe patients are delayed in transition to PP3M because of expectation to complete stabilization.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of 123 patients, diagnosed with psychotic disorders, on treatment with paliperidone palmitate 1 month or 3 months, was performed. Age, sex, type of paliperidone treatment, hospitalizations after the initiaton of treatment, years since diagnosis, polytherapy and toxic habits were some of the variables measured and compared between both groups (PP1M and PP3M).

Results

Most of patients (63,41%) were on PP3M. Both groups shared characteristics like male sex predominance, schizophrenia as the most common diagnosis, having a recent onset diagnosis, same frequency of polypharmacy and same pattern of drug consumption. There was a slight difference between both groups regarding severity. PP1M and PP3M showed respectively 33% and 16,7% of admissions after initiation.

Conclusions

No clear pattern determines less transition to PP3M from PP1M. No statistical difference was found except form the difference found in admission after change of treatment (to PP1M or PP3M), which could reflect influence of severity in treatment. Future research is needed in order to better elucidate this association.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.