Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:18:16.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of defence mechanisms in adolescent patients with deliberate self-harm behaviour and without it

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

A. Vuk*
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan, Adult Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia
A. Razic Pavicic
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Adult Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia
L. Santric
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia
A. Tomac
Affiliation:
Clinic for Psychological Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Zagreb, Croatia
*
* Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Twenty percent of children and adolescent population are suffering from psychiatric disorders, according to World Health Organization. Above that, clinical work and previous published reports point to increase of self-harm behaviour incidence and prevalence in many countries, including Croatia.

Aims

To compare defence mechanisms in adolescent patients with deliberate self-harm behaviour and without it.

Objectives

To explore differences in adaptive and maladaptive defence mechanisms in adolescent patients with self-harm behaviour and without this behaviour; to gain better insight in possible perception and functioning patterns in these two patient subgroups. To assess the effect of possible differences on early diagnostic procedure and therapeutic plan.

Methods

Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ) was administered to 150 patients aged between 14 and 18 years on their first visit to child and adolescent psychiatrist. Sevety-nine patients had history of self-harm behaviour and 81 patients had negative anamnestic data on such behaviour.

Results

Comparison of defence mechanisms in these two patient subgroups showed a statistically relevant difference in using defence mechanisms.

Conclusion

Results of this study showed significant difference between patients with self-harm behaviour and without such behaviour regarding used defence mechanisms. Awareness of specific mental patterns in patients with self-harm behaviour provides better assessment of suicidal risk and optimal individual approach planning.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW98
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.