Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:10:18.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive Abilities Changes after Electroconvulsive Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P. Sabol
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts, University of P.J. Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic
J. Dragasek
Affiliation:
1st Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of P. J. Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic
M. Kovanicova
Affiliation:
1st Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of P. J. Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic
E. Palova
Affiliation:
1st Dept. of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of P. J. Safarik, Kosice, Slovak Republic

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment for certain psychiatric disorders. It has long been known that ECT can produce deficits in anterograde, retrograde memory and non-memory-related cognitive functions.

Aims

Our research is focused to test selected cognitive abilities of patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy. Our main concern was focused on changes in memory, attention, psychomotor speed and intellect.

Methods

Changes in cognitive abilities were assessed in 30 patients from the 1st Department of Psychiatry, University of P.J.Safarik in Kosice before and after ECT treatment session. To assess changes in cognitive abilities we have used Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (REY), Attention-Concentration Test (ACT), Trail Making Test (TMT) and Intelect Potential Test (TIP).

Results

We have observed statistical significant improvement in visual and short-term memory test (preECT REY 10,92 ± 6,7 vs postECT REY 12,73 ± 5,06, p = 0,047), statistical non-significant improvement in psychomotor speed test (preECT TMT 68,88 ± 45,13 vs postECT TMT 65,15 ± 49,74, p = 0,062), statistical significant improvement in attention-concentration test (preECT ACT 0,74 ± 0,3 vs postECT ACT 0,85 ± 0,16, p = 0,021) and statistical non-significant improvement in intellect potential test (preECT TIP 7,45 ± 7,37 vs post ECT TIP 8,28 ± 6,45, p = 0,142).

Conclusion

Further research is required to determine changes in cognitive abilities associated with ECT in homogenous patients’ population. The validity and limitations are discussed.

Type
P02-542
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.