Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T16:20:56.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of Cognitive Performance and Psychophysiological Signals in Mental Patients by a Novel Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

M. Fűzi*
Affiliation:
1Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen
B. Petró
Affiliation:
2Aviatronic Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
P. Barna
Affiliation:
2Aviatronic Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
K. Kósa
Affiliation:
1Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Mental disorders often manifest broad cognitive deficits that detrimentally affect daily functioning. Stress indicated by heart rate variability (HRV) has been linked to these cognitive functions.

Objectives

We aimed to develop a new method to assess cognitive performance and simultaneous measurement of psychophysiological signals related to stress and relaxation levels.

Methods

20 adult patients with mental disorders in a rehabilitation program were recruited along with 21 healthy volunteers. A test protocol was carried out with a purpose-developed computerized psychophysiological device. The protocol consisted of a relaxation period; digitized questionnaires on pathological distress (GHQ) and sense of coherence (SOC); gamified cognitive tasks to assess working memory, attention, and decision-making; and a final relaxation period. Acute stress was assessed by heart rate variability measured by a wireless ECG sensor. The inter-beat interval’s root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) was calculated as an inverse stress measure. Relaxation levels were assessed by the relative power of the alpha frequency band measured by a commercial 4-channel EEG headband. Stress and relaxation levels were compared to the first relaxation period as a baseline.

Results

Patients scored worse than the reference group both regarding distress (d=7, p=0.004) and sense of coherence (d=-8, p=0.047). The cognitive performance of patients was significantly lower (p<0.001) than the reference group for all tasks.

RMSSD at baseline tended to be lower for patients (d=-12.69, p=0.098), reflecting a higher level of physiological stress; 61% of patients started at an elevated stress level compared to 25% of the reference group. In addition, relative alpha levels at baseline were also lower (d=-5.8%, p=0.007) for patients.

Compared to baseline, RMSSD decreased on average to 94% during cognitive assessments in patients and decreased to 91% by the end of the final relaxation. RMSSD decreased to 76% in the reference group and reached a final value of 78% of the baseline. Alpha levels slightly increased among patients during the tasks (103.4%) and then returned close to baseline (99.1%). For the reference group, alpha decreased during the tasks (95.5%) and then slightly increased (97.3%).

Conclusions

Patients displayed heightened distress, reduced sense of coherence, and inferior cognitive scores compared to controls. While starting with higher stress, patients exhibited less elevation in stress during tasks, coupled with alterations in alpha levels, suggesting diminished engagement or focus. Our innovative method could aid in the diagnostics of cognitive performance in mental patients after further measurements for validation.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.