Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-28T12:20:18.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of drug-drug interactions in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports from EudraVigilance focusing on psychiatric drugs and somatic medication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

D. Dubrall*
Affiliation:
1University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 2Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, 53175
R. Weber
Affiliation:
2Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, 53175
M. Boehme
Affiliation:
2Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, 53175
M. Schmid
Affiliation:
1University Hospital of Bonn, 53127
B. Sachs
Affiliation:
2Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, 53175 3University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074, Germany
C. Scholl
Affiliation:
2Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, 53175
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Patients with severe mental illnesses (SMI) are often exposed to polymedication. Additionally, the risk of somatic diseases is twice as high in patients with SMI as in individuals without a psychiatric disorder. Furthermore, drug–drug interactions (DDI) between psychiatric drugs and somatic medications are a well-known cause of adverse drug reactions (ADR).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyse whether already known DDI related to psychiatric drugs and somatic medication still occur in everyday clinical practice.

Methods

Therefore we identified all spontaneous ADR reports contained in the European ADR database EudraVigilance from Germany received between 01/2017 and 12/2021 reported for patients older than 17 years in which antidepressants, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers were reported as suspected/interacting (n= 9,665). ADR reports referring to intentional overdoses and suicide attempts were excluded (n= 9,276 left). We used the ABDATA drug information system in order to identify all potential DDI (pDDI). The identified reports with pDDI were then assessed individually to determine whether the respective DDI occurred.

Results

1,271 reports with 728 potentially interacting drugs pairs related to psychiatric drugs and somatic medications with 2,655 pDDI were found. Restricted to potentially interacting drug pairs with more than 10 reports, (i) hyponatremias related to antidepressants and diuretics (n= 362, 32.6%), (ii) bleeding events related to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and platelet aggregation inhibitors, anticoagulants or non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) (n= 295, 17.5%), and (iii) increased beta-blocker effects related to SSRIs and beta-blockers (n= 126, 11.3%) were the most frequently identified pDDI. After individual case assessment, in 33.3% (14/42), 23.7% (45/190) and 17.4% (8/46) of the reports bleeding events related to SSRIs and anticoagulants, SSRIs and platelet aggregation inhibitors and SSRIs and NSAIDs were reported. Hyponatremia was reported in 7.6% (22/289) of the reports related to antidepressants and diuretics and increased beta-blocker effects in 6.9% (8/116) of the reports related to SSRIs and beta-blockers.

Conclusions

According to our analysis, well-known DDI still occur in the treatment of psychiatric patients with psychiatric drugs and somatic medication. Whenever possible, alternative drug combinations with a lower potential of DDIs may be considered or appropriate monitoring measures should be conducted.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.