Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T18:55:15.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An assessment of the content of discharge summaries at Mount Carmel Hospital, Malta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

E. Camilleri*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
G. Grech
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
Y. Farrugia
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
J. Padovani
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Mount Carmel Hospital, Attard, Malta
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Discharge summaries are the mainstay of intra and inter-departmental communication, ensuring continuity of care. Local instructions fail to provide clear guidance to foundation doctors to ensure standardised discharge summaries.

Objectives

The audit aimed to assess the inclusion of information within discharge summaries at Mount Carmel Hospital, Malta. A secondary objective was to update the current online discharge summary framework.

Methods

Stratified random sampling was used to select 120 discharge summaries, issued between October 2018 and September 2019. These were chosen out of a total of 956 discharge summaries issued during the period. The inclusion of information was analysed against the National Standard for Patient Discharge Summary Information issued by the Health Information and Quality Authority, Ireland. Data was collected and grouped into seven categories each containing multiple data points.

Results

Patient details were present in all discharge summaries while no details relating to the primary care healthcare professional were documented. The average information inclusion rate regarding admission, discharge and medications was 85%. Average clinical information was documented in 50% while that of future management and person completing discharge summary was found in 41% and 28% respectively (as per Table 1). Encouragingly, discharge summaries contained mandatory information more frequently than conditional or optional information.

Conclusions

This audit has identified deficiencies in current discharge summary practices and gives recommendations for the development of local guidelines.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.