Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T22:12:48.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aggression management of criminal offenders in prison setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

G. Nikolić*
Affiliation:
1Department of psychiatry
N. M. Stojanović
Affiliation:
2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine
J. Branković
Affiliation:
3Daily hospital, Center for mental health protection
S. Tošić Golubović
Affiliation:
4Clinic for Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Niš, Serbia
O. Žikić
Affiliation:
1Department of psychiatry
J. Kostić
Affiliation:
1Department of psychiatry
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

A new approach of social therapy for criminal offenders was applied in Penalty Facility in Niš, Serbia. It is based on three month peer-training focusing on recognizing of triggers for anger, understanding emotional manifestation and learning socially acceptable ways of anger expression.

Objectives

To estimate how the impact of pear-based training influences the level of agression of criminal offenders in prison settings.

Methods

One hander and six prisoners were randomly assigned to program. The six previously educated inmates trained the participants through 12 work-shops. An independent professional evaluated change in aggression levels after training using Buss&Perry Aggression Scale. We compared subgroups with shorter versus longer sentences pre and post training using Student’s t test. And univariate logistic regression analysis for impacts of sociodemographic variables on aggression scores.

Results

We found a significant higher scores of anger (6.6 ± 4.7 & 11.8 ± 4.2, p=0,043) hostility (15.5 ± 8 & 20.1 ± 6.5, p=0,029) and total aggression (32 ± 14 & 48 ± 21, p=0,023 in subgroup with longer sentences at baseline. After training anger (12.4 ± 4.8 & 15.5 ± 5.6, p= 0,0167), physical aggression (14.6 ± 51. & 17.2 ± 5.6 ,p=0,024) and total aggression score (55.5 ± 14.1 & 68.2 ± 18, p=0,0152) remained higher in the group with sentences more than five years. Lower education level is associated with undesirable outcome-higher level of aggression after training.

Conclusions

Three months training was not sufficient for adopting skills for better control of aggressive behavior in criminal offenders never the less the length of the sentences.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.