The brachial plexus was identified by electrical stimulation before interscalene block with 30 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200 000. During injection, compresion was applied with a finger proximal to the injection site. Spirometric measurements were made before the block, and then at 5 min, 10 min, 20 min and 4 h after the injection. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured radiographically before the block, and at 15 min and 4 h afterwards. In 25 patients studied, spirometric measurements decreased. Twenty minutes after the injection, the forced vital capacity was 27% less, forced expiratory volume at 1 s 34% less and peak expiratory flow rate 15% less (all P<0.05). Right diaphragmatic excursion decreased from 4.5 cm (SD 1.2 cm) to 1.8 cm (0.6 cm) at 15 mins and to 1.1 cm (0.6 cm) at 4 h (P<0.05). Identification of the plexus by electric stimulation combined with finger compression above the injection site did not prevent diaphragmatic paresis.

Pulmonary impairment is more frequent after cardiac surgery than after other major surgical procedures. The present study investigates whether, by using standard respiratory monitoring, i.e. side-stream spirometry and blood gas analysis, it is possible to detect changes in pulmonary function secondary to cardiopulmonary bypass. We investigated 18 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery or aortic valve replacement. Cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in a nonsignificant increase in alveolar-arterial oxygen difference from 33.0 ± 10.6 kPa to 36.1 ± 12.5 kPa and arterial to end-tidal CO2 tension difference from 0.67±0.39 kPa to 0.79±0.54 kPa. Respiratory system resistance was unaltered. In contrast, dynamic compliance decreased significantly after cardiopulmonary bypass from 78.6 ± 22.9 to 65.4 ± 22.4 mL cmH2O−1 with open chest and from 61.0 ± 10.2 to 51.1 ± 17.2 mL cmH2O−1 with closed chest, compared with corresponding values before cardiopulmonary bypass. In conclusion, pulmonary gas exchange was not compromised after cardiopulmonary bypass, but a diminished respiratory compliance was a consistent finding, even in uncomplicated cardiac surgery using routine respiratory monitoring.

The present study contrasted the pharmaco-economics and analgesic efficacy of intramuscular (i.m.) opioid treatment with a parenteral disposable patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system in two groups of 20 female patients (ASA I–II, aged 35–69 years) scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy. The PCA group received a continuous infusion of 1.5 mg h−1 piritramide, a μ-opioid receptor agonist, with incremental doses of 1.5 mg (lock-out interval=15 min). The i.m. group received 0.3 mg kg−1 piritramide i.m. when requested by the patient with a minimum interval of 5 h. Pain intensity, sedation and the functional recovery of the patients were followed for 72 h post-operatively. The sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) was used as a measure of analgesic efficiency. Equipment and drug costs, and the demand on nursing time were recorded over 3 days post-operatively. The costs of PCA and i.m. therapies per patient were used to calculate the cost-benefit (cost of treatment vs. nursing time) and cost-effectiveness (cost of treatment vs. SPID) analyses. Both treatments initially provided comparable analgesia, but PCA was more efficient after 16 h and significantly reduced nursing time for pain treatment (PCA=61±4 min, i.m.=88±5 min; P<0.001). Functional recovery was not different for either treatment. Cost analysis indicated a better cost-benefit ratio for the i.m. treatment (0.35 vs. 1.1 for PCA treatment), but a similar cost-effectiveness for both treatments (PCA=1.9 Belgian Francs (BEF) unit−1 SPID; i.m.=1.7 BEF unit−1 SPID).

The haemodynamic effects of anaesthesia with gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)/sufentanil for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were investigated and compared in patients with unimpaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥45%, left ventricular end diastolic pressure ≤16 mmHg) and patients with impaired left ventricular function. In 38 consecutive patients scheduled for CABG (21 with unimpaired and 17 with impaired left ventricular function), anaesthesia was induced with etomidate, sufentanil and pancuronium. After tracheal intubation, the lungs were normoventilated (end tidal Pco2 4.9−5.6 kPa) with an oxygen-air mixture (Fio2 0.5). Total intravenous anaesthesia was maintained with GHB (20 mg kg−1 h−1after a ‘priming dose’ of 40 mg kg−1) and sufentanil (2 μg kg−1 h−1). Haemodynamic measurements were made after induction of anaesthesia and at various times in the prebypass period. Patients in both groups showed similar haemodynamic trends. Mean arterial pressure showed a maximum reduction of 10%, whereas heart rate and right- and left-sided filling pressures remained unchanged within the groups after the induction of anaesthesia. Cardiac index remained unchanged in both groups, although values differed between the groups. A total of 14 out of 21 patients (67%) with unimpaired and 10 out of 17 patients (59%) with impaired ventricular function required supplementary administration of opioids to control temporary hypertension after sternotomy. No episodes of myocardial ischaemia were detected during the study period using ST segment analysis (leads II and V5). The results of this study suggest that GHB provides adequate haemodynamic conditions in the prebypass period and may be a suitable agent for TIVA also in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing CABG.

In clinical practice, anaesthetists encounter many patients who are on concurrent medication which may have the potential to interact with drugs used during anaesthesia. Many patients are receiving as many as a dozen drugs of various kinds, thus, increasing the risk of a drug interaction occurring. Unfortunately, anaesthetists tend not to report drug interactions which occur during anaesthesia—especially those of a minor nature such as flushing—and hence, the true number of drug interactions is unknown. We have developed a chart indicating the nature of important interactions that the anaesthetist may encounter.

In a double-blinded study we examined the effect of supplementing patient-controlled morphine analgesia with intercostal nerve blockade to identify if this improved analgesia and reduced morphine requirements following renal transplantation. Fifty patients were randomized to receive unilateral intercostal nerve block with either 0.5% bupivacaine or saline to the lower five intercostal nerves. Each block was performed on the side of surgical incision following the completion of surgery. Patients receiving bupivacaine blockade reported reduced pain scores and used less morphine in the initial 4 h following renal transplantation, but did not demonstrate a significant reduction in overall pain scores, total 24 h morphine requirements, or sedation scores. Two patients developed a pneumothorax, neither of which were clinically apparent at the time of diagnosis, and only detected by chest radiography. A chest radiograph should therefore be considered mandatory after intercostal nerve blockade.

The aim of this prospective, randomized and double-blind study was to assess the effects of a high dose of the analgesic tramadol administered at the conclusion of surgery on extubation time, sedation, and post-anaesthetic shivering. Forty adult patients, ASA physical status I or II, underwent laparoscopic surgery of about 1 h duration and received a standardized anaesthesia that was maintained with isoflurane in O2/N2O. Tramadol 3mg kg−1 (n=20) was administered intravenously at the beginning of wound closure, and was compared with saline (n=20). Post-anaesthetic shivering did not occur in any patient who received tramadol, whereas it occurred in 60% of the control group ( P<0.001). There were no adverse effects on time to extubation and sedation, and discharge-ready time was shorter in the tramadol group (P<0.05 compared with control). Pain scores in the post-an-aesthesia care unit (PACU) were statistically not different between the two groups, but significantly more supplemental medication was administered in the control group to treat shivering and/or pain. In conclusion, administration of a high dose of tramadol at the end of surgery prevents post-anaesthetic shivering without prolongation of extubation time, and shortens the PACU/discharge-ready time.

Thirty-eight ASA I–III patients undergoing lower abdominal operations were randomly allocated to receive either morphine (group M, patient-controlled analgesia bolus=1 mg of morphine) or tramadol (group T, patient-controlled analgesia bolus=10 mg of tramadol) for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after receiving morphine intraoperatively. There were no between-group differences in the pain, sedation or vomit scores. The nausea scores were significantly higher in group T in the initial 20 h and between 32 and 36 h (P<0.01, 0–4 and 8–12 h; P<0.05, 4–8, 12–16, 16–20 and 32–36 h). The incidence of dizziness was also significantly higher in group T (68.4% vs. 31.6%, group T vs. group M, P<0.05). There was no difference in the overall satisfaction. We conclude that the use of tramadol, compared with morphine, for post-operative PCA after intraoperative loading with morphine is associated with more nausea and dizziness, but with similar sedation, quality of analgesia and patient satisfaction.

Eighty patients were recruited into a double-blind, randomized trial to find the optimal dose of droperidol for addition to the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine infusate for female patients undergoing gynaecological surgery. A standardized anaesthetic technique was employed. Post-operative analgesia was provided by PCA morphine. Patients were allocated at random into one of four treatment groups receiving with each PCA morphine bolus: (1) droperidol 0.05 mg; (2) droperidol 0.10 mg; (3) droperidol 0.15 mg; and (4) droperidol 0.20 mg, respectively. The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), requests for rescue anti-emetic medication, and incidence of side effects were recorded. The number of symptom-free patients in each group increased as the droperidol dose increased, but although there was a significant inverse association between the total dose of droperidol received and the severity of PONV (P<0.05), there were no significant differences between individual groups. In each group, patients were significantly less sedated at 24 h compared with 12 h (P<0.01). However, after 24 h, patients in group 4 were significantly more sedated than patients in groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the incidence of anxiety or other side effects attributable to droperidol. The present authors suggest that, although the results demonstrate few statistically significant differences between the four groups, a PCA bolus dose of droperidol of 0.10 mg mL−1 appears to provide the optimal balance between anti-emetic efficacy and an acceptable incidence of side effects.

A transoesophageal Doppler cardiac output monitor was used to study the cardiovascular changes occurring during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients without (group A) or with (group B) a history of cardiovascular disease, i.e. hypertension, ischaemic heart disease or heart failure. Insufflation of the abdomen with carbon dioxide caused significant (P<0.01) falls in mean cardiac index (17.9% in group A, 25.1% in group B) and mean stroke volume index (15.3% in group A, 21.2% in group B). Simultaneously, there was a significant (P<0.05) increase in mean systolic blood pressure (19.4%) in group A. There were no other differences in the cardiovascular responses of the two groups. There was no correlation between systolic blood pressure and either cardiac index or stroke volume index. No significant complications or morbidity were associated with the use of the transoesophageal Doppler monitor. We conclude that the cardiovascular changes associated with insufflation are neither predictable by clinical assessment nor adequately determined by routine monitoring. We recommend the transoesophageal Doppler monitor for use in this situation.

Ten patients, predicted to pose a difficult intubation of the trachea, underwent inhalational induction of anaesthesia using sevoflurane. In all 10 cases the airway was secured successfully and the patient proceeded to have the planned operation. In six of the cases the anaesthetist experienced a problem during the induction but in no case did this present any real difficulties or lead to a critical incident. We feel that sevoflurane has a place for inhalational induction in this challenging group of patients.

The cause of hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia is unknown. Up until now, the only factor studied has been the effect of the diameter of the spinal needle on post-operative sensorineural hearing loss. The aim of this study was to describe this hearing loss and to investigate other factors influencing the degree of hearing loss. Two groups of 22 similar patients were studied: one group received 6 mL prilocaine 2%; and the other received 3 mL bupivacaine 0.5%. Patients given prilocaine were more likely to develop hearing loss (10 out of 22) than those given bupivacaine (4 out of 22) (P<0.05). The average hearing loss for speech frequencies was about 10 dB after prilocaine and 15 dB after bupivacaine. None of the patients complained of subjective hearing loss. Long-term follow-up of the patients was not possible.

The clinical availability of artificial oxygen carriers (AOCs) would result in profound alterations in transfusion medical practice. Rapid progress in the scientific and technological development of AOCs has advanced to a critical stage at which safe and effective alternatives to the transfusion of red blood cells are emerging. Haemoglobin- and perfluorocarbon-based oxygen carriers are under current clinical investigation. Artificial oxygen-carrying solutions, by virtue of their acellular structure, can be used to transport oxygen to ischaemic tissues that cannot otherwise be reached by cellular blood components. Organs awaiting transplantation can be preserved for a long time after perfusion with AOCs and tumour susceptibility to chemo- and radiotherapy is increased. The use of AOCs is therefore not confined to their use as red blood cell substitutes, but may find a wide spectrum of interdisciplinary applications.

In order to compare the neuromuscular effects following rocuronium 0.6 mg kg−1 and atracurium 0.5 mg kg−1 30 children aged from 18 to 67 months were studied under the same anaesthetic conditions. After induction of anaesthesia with etomidate and fentanyl, neuromuscular blockade was monitored by recording the electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to a supramaximal train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 2 Hz for 2 s at 20-s intervals. Intubation was performed when more than 90% muscle relaxation was achieved, thereafter anaesthesia was maintained with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane 0.5% end-tidal. Mean onset of action was significantly faster following rocuronium (86±44.9 s) (mean±SD) compared with atracurium (126.3±61.0 s). Clinical duration with rocuronium was 22.8±5.31 min and thus significantly shorter than that of atracurium, which was 31.5±6.01 min. A statistically significant difference between rocuronium and atracurium also had been found for recovery of T1 to 50%, 75% and 90% as well as for the time taken to a TOF ratio of 70%. The recovery index for rocuronium and atracurium was not significantly different with 9.2±3.43 min and 10.9±2.65 min, respectively. Thus, rocuronium may be more advantageous than atracurium for short-lasting surgical procedures in young children.

The purpose of this study was to analyse the clinical agreement between cardiac output measurements, obtained using a newly available continuous thermodilution technique, and the conventional intermittent bolus technique. Twenty-four cardiac surgical patients were intra-operatively monitored using both techniques. Additionally, two different averaging modes for the continuous thermodilution technique, either the previous 6 min (group 1) or 3 min (group 2) were compared. The mean difference between the continuous thermodilution technique and the intermittent bolus technique (bias), were calculated at eight selected time points. These ranged from −0.09 to 0.42 litres min−1 in group 1 and from −0.02 to 0.18 litres min−1 in group 2. There were significant differences at any time point between the groups. The relative error between continuous thermodilution and intermittent bolus techniques was <15% for the majority of measurements and was significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 just prior to cardiopulmonary bypass. Thus, the continuous thermo-dilution technique produced a clinically acceptable level of accuracy compared with the intermittent bolus technique measurements, especially when using an averaging mode for the previous 3 min.

Tramadol is a centrally acting opioid with a low affinity resfor μ-opioid receptors, which has been claimed not to depress respiration as do the classic opioids. The respiratory effects of intravenous (i.v.) pethidine (0.6 mg kg−1) and tramadol (0.6 mg kg−1) were compared in 36 ASA Grade I–II patients in a placebo-controlled double-blind study. After induction of anaesthesia with propofol followed by suxamethonium-facilitated endotracheal intubation, the patients spontaneously breathed halothane in 70% nitrous oxide and oxygen via a non-rebreathing valve. Inspiratory and expiratory oxygen, and end-tidal carbon dioxide concentrations (PetCO2), tidal volume (VT), minute volume of ventilation (MV) and respiratory rate were monitored by a side-stream spirometry at an end-tidal halothane of 0.3%. The recordings were collected before surgery. Pethidine caused significant respiratory depression seen as an increase in fractional inspiratory–expiratory oxygen difference and PetCO2 and as a decrease in MV and respiratory rate. However, the effects of tramadol were similar to those of a placebo. Tidal volume was not affected by any study drug. In conclusion, tramadol 0.6 mg kg−1 was shown not to be associated with respiratory depression, unlike equipotent dose of pethidine in this setting.

Procalcitonin, a new innovative inflammation parameter is presently being evaluated in clinical studies. It has been shown to be increased markedly in patients with severe bacteria induced inflammation, septic shock, endotoxinaemia and multiple organ failure. In contrast, severe viral infections or inflammatory reactions of non-infectious origin as well as autoimmune or allergic disorders do not or only very moderately increase procalcitonin serum levels. Because procalcitonin is observed at significantly higher concentrations in bacterial infections, it might assist differentiation between these infections and other aetiologies of critical illnesses. Furthermore, pro-calcitonin correlates with the severity of infection and sepsis and thus could serve as a useful marker for monitoring surgical high risk patients. Procalcitonin may serve as a valid and sensitive indicator for bacterial infection with important diagnostic potential in the peri-operative period and in intensive care medicine.

This study was undertaken to investigate the neuromuscular blocking profile and cardiovascular effects of Org 9487, a new aminosteroidal, non-depolarizing, neuromuscular blocking agent structurally related to vecuronium, in anaesthetized animals and in isolated muscle preparations. In in vitro functional assays of neuromuscular blocking activity, Org 9487 was between eight and 15 times less potent than vecuronium. In cats and monkeys the potency of Org 9487 was approximately one-seventh and one-twentieth, respectively, that of vecuronium. In both species, Org 9487 induced rapidly developing (onset times between 1.5 min and 1.9 min) neuromuscular paralysis, which was shorter-lasting than that of vecuronium and similar in time course to suxamethonium. The vagal: neuromuscular blocking dose ratio for Org 9487 was 3 and ganglion block was seen only at approximately 20 times the neuromuscular blocking dose. There was no evidence in the rat that Org 9487, administered at doses up to 3mg kg−1, inhibited noradrenaline re uptake. In anaesthetized dogs, Org 9487 (3 × 90% blocking dose) induced only relatively small and transient haemodynamic effects. The administration of clinically relevant doses of neostigmine or pyridostigmine shortened the time–course profile of Org 9487, even when administered during profound neuromuscular block. In animals, Org 9487 is a low potency, nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent with a time course profile similar to that of suxamethonium. Although Org 9487 is less selective than vecuronium for the neuromuscular junction, it is unlikely to produce prohibitive cardiovascular side effects in man.

Checking the anaesthetic machine before its daily use is essential. The aim of our study was to evaluate, through the use of an anonymous questionnaire, how the anaesthetists of our institution (physicians and nurses) report their daily checking. Sixty-three questions were used to ask the participants how frequently they checked the main components of the anaesthetic machine; the answers were evaluated with a score (0–3). The overall response rate was 78%, nurses' rate being lower than physicians' rate. Nurses obtained a higher global score, which raises the question of different adherence to guidelines by nurses and physicians. Moreover, questions in relation to gas supply were badly scored by all participants, which should alert us to reinforce theoretical and practical training in these items. Finally, although the methodology used in this survey could raise the question of the best way to evaluate the actual checkout procedure, self-reported assessment remains an alternative to more complex and expensive methods, such as an observer or a video evaluation.

The cardiovascular effects of Org 9487 during isoflurane anaesthesia have been evaluated using three doses around its ED90 for neuromuscular blockade, i.e. 1 mg kg−1, 2 mg kg−1 and 3 mg kg−1. Heart rate increased to 110%, 115% and 118% in patients receiving 1 mg kg−1, 2 mg kg−1 and 3 mg kg−1 respectively. There were no significant effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressures for the two lower dose groups. Patients receiving Org 9487 3 mg kg−1 displayed significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (91% and 82% of the control values respectively). Except for heart rate in the group receiving 3 mg kg−1, all measurements returned to baseline after a maximum of 15 min. Six patients experienced a transient increase in airway pressure after administration of Org 9487, which was accompanied by a decrease in oxygen saturation in two out of six subjects, but there was no audible wheezing. These episodes were self-limiting and required no treatment. There were no other adverse reactions to this drug during this study.