Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:42:10.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Equivariant images of projective space under the action of SL (n, ℤ)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Robert J. Zimmer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The point of this note is to answer in the affirmative a question of G. A. Margulis. In the course of his proof of the finiteness of either the cardinality or the index of a normal subgroup of an irreducible lattice in a higher rank semi-simple Lie group [3], [4], Margulis proves that if Γ = SL (n, ℤ), n≥3, (X, μ) is a measurable Γ-space, μ quasi-invariant, and φ: ℙn−1X is a measure class preserving Γ-map, then either φ is a measure space isomorphism or μ is supported on a point. Margulis then asks whether the topological analogue of this result is true. This is answered in the following.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

REFERENCES

[1]Dani, S. G. & Raghavan, S.. Orbits of Euclidean frames under discrete linear groups. Israel J. Math. 36 (1980), 300320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Greenberg, L.. Discrete groups with dense orbits. In Flows on Homogeneous Spaces (ed. Auslander, L.), pp. 85103. Annals of Math. Studies no. 53. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 1963.Google Scholar
[3]Margulis, G. A.. Factors of discrete subgroups. Soviet Math. Dokl. 19 (1978), 11451149.Google Scholar
[4]Margulis, G. A.. Quotients of discrete subgroups and measure theory. Fund. Anal. Appl. 12 (1978), 295305.Google Scholar
[5]Mostow, G. D.. Strong Rigidity of Locally Symmetric Spaces. Annals of Math. Studies no. 78. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 1973.Google Scholar
[6]Veech, W. A.. Unique ergodicity of horospherical flows. Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 827859.Google Scholar