Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How to get Certain Knowledge from Fallible Justification

  • Peter D. Klein (a1)

Abstract

“Real knowledge,” as I use the term, is the most highly prized form of true belief sought by an epistemic agent. This paper argues that defeasible infinitism provides a good way to characterize real knowledge and it shows how real knowledge can arise from fallible justification. Then, I argue that there are two ways of interpreting Ernest Sosa's account of real knowledge as belief that is aptly formed and capable of being fully defended. On the one hand, if beliefs are aptly formed only if they have a specific causal etiology, namely that they are efficiently caused fully or partially by virtuous characteristics of the epistemic agent, then Sosa's account falls prey to what I call the problem of the Hazard of Empirical Disconfirmation (HED). The HED problem applies to all forms of causal accounts of real knowledge and is simply that as we gain more empirical knowledge about the causal origins of our true beliefs that are the most highly prized we will discover that they do not always (or even hardly ever) satisfy the required efficient causal constraints. Bluntly put, having sufficiently good reasons for our beliefs might not require that the beliefs have the requisite efficient causal etiology. On the other hand, there is a way of interpreting Sosa's views that does not include an efficient causal prerequisite. That interpretation makes Sosa's account of real knowledge almost identical to defeasible infinitism but expressed in an alternate vocabulary. Such a view is not subject to the HED problem and it can solve the deep problem in epistemology, namely how to get epistemically certain (as opposed to psychologically certain) knowledge from fallible justification.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: pdklein@scarletmail.rutgers.edu

References

Hide All
Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vols I and II. Edited by Cooper, J.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Atkinson, D. and Peijnenburg, J. (2017). Fading Foundations: Probability and the Regress Problem. Berlin: Springer.
Ayer, A.J. (1956). The Problem of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
Chisholm, R. (1966). Theory of Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Descartes, R. (1955). Philosophical Works of Descartes. Edited by E. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Empiricus, S. (1976). Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Translated by Bury, R.G.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Firth, R. (1978). ‘Are Epistemic Concepts Reducible to Ethical Concepts?’ In Goldman, A. and Kim, J. (eds), Values and Morals. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Gettier, E. (1963). ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Analysis 23, 121–3.
Goldman, A. (1979). ‘What Is Justified Belief?’ In Pappas, G.S. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge, pp. 123. Dordrecht: Reidel; reprinted in Goldman A. 2012. Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 29–49. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Harman, R. (1973). Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hilpinen, R. (2017). ‘Sed ubi Socrates Currit? On the Gettier Problem Before Gettier.’ In Borges, R., de Almeida, C. and Klein, P. (eds), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem, pp. 135–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Second Edition. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L.A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kant, E. (1961). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Smith, N.K.. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
Klein, P. (1980). ‘Misleading Evidence and the Restoration of Justification.’ Philosophical Studies 37(1), 81–9.
Klein, P. (1983). ‘Real Knowledge.’ Synthese 55(2), 143–64.
Klein, P. (1995). ‘Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails.’ Philosophical Topics 23(1), 213–36.
Klein, P. (2004 a). ‘Closure Matters: Skepticism and Easy Knowledge.’ Philosophical Issues 14, 165–84.
Klein, P. (2004 b). ‘There is No Good Reason to be an Academic Skeptic.’ In Luper, S. (ed.), Essential Knowledge, pp. 299309. New York, NY: Longman Publishers.
Klein, P. (2005). ‘Is Infinitism the Solution to the Epistemic Regress Problem?’ In Steup, M. and Sosa, E. (eds), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, pp. 131–40. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. [2nd edition, Wiley Blackwell, 2014, pp. 274–82.]
Klein, P. (2007). ‘Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning.’ Philosophical Studies 134(1), 117.
Klein, P. (2014). ‘Reasons, Reasoning, and Knowledge: A Proposed Rapprochement between Infinitism and Foundationalism.’ In Klein, P. and Turri, J. (eds), Ad Infinitum: New Essays on Epistemological Infinitism, pp. 105–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klein, P. (2017). ‘The Nature of Knowledge.’ In Borges, R., de Almeida, C. and Klein, P. (eds), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem, pp. 3556. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (2011). Philosophical Troubles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, K. and Paxson, T. (1969). ‘Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief.’ Journal of Philosophy 66(8), 225–37.
Malcolm, N. (1952). ‘Knowledge and Belief.’ Mind 61, 178–89.
Mill, J.S. (1974). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VII – A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive Part I [1843]. Book III. Edited by Robson, J.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974. Also available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/246.
Moore, G.E. (1994). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: A. Belknap Press.
Pasnau, R. (1995). ‘William Heytesbury on Knowledge: Epistemology without Necessary and Sufficient Conditions.’ History of Philosophy Quarterly 12, 347–66.
Pasnau, R. (1997). Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plato, (1997). Complete Works. Edited by Cooper, J.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Pollock, J. (1974). Knowledge and Justification. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pollock, J. (1987). ‘Defeasible Reasoning.’ Cognitive Science 11, 481518.
Shope, R. (1983). The Analysis of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sosa, E. (1999). ‘How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.’ Noûs (Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, Epistemology) 33(s13), 141–53.
Sosa, E. (2001). ‘Varieties of Causation.’ In Sosa, E. and Tooley, M. (eds), Oxford Readings in Philosophy, pp. 234–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sosa, E. (2007). A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sosa, E. (2014). ‘Infinitism.’ In Klein, P. and Turri, J. (eds), Ad Infinitum: New Essays on Epistemological Infinitism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turri, J. (2014). ‘Creative Reasoning.’ In Klein, P. and Turri, J. (eds), Ad Infinitum: New Essays on Epistemological Infinitism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Unger, P. (1975). Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. (1994). ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems.’ Philosophical Quarterly 44(174), 6573.
Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keywords

How to get Certain Knowledge from Fallible Justification

  • Peter D. Klein (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed