Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:28:54.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REASONS FOR REASONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2015

Baron Reed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hilary Kornblith explores the prospects for reasons eliminationism, the view that reasons ought not to be regarded as being of central importance in epistemology. I reply by conceding that reasons may not be necessary for knowledge, in at least some cases, but I argue that they are nevertheless vitally important in epistemology more broadly. Their importance stems from being necessary, not for knowledge but for us, given that we are social agents with practical concerns. In that sense, we have (social and practical) reasons for (having a practice of giving and receiving epistemic) reasons.

Type
Articles
Information
Episteme , Volume 12 , Special Issue 2: 10th Anniversary of Episteme , June 2015 , pp. 241 - 247
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2012. On Reflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2015. ‘The Role of Reasons in Epistemology.’ Episteme. doi: 10.1017/epi.2015.10.Google Scholar
Reed, B. 2002. ‘How to Think about Fallibilism.’ Philosophical Studies 107: 143–57.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1963. ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.’ In Science, Perception and Reality, pp. 127–96. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2000. ‘Dretske on Epistemic Entitlement.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60: 607–12.Google Scholar