Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Authenticity versus autonomy: the synthesis of World Englishes as a discipline

  • Claire Cowie (a1)

Extract

World Englishes, like other topics covered in the Routledge Introduction to Applied Linguistics series (ELT, Classroom Discourse, Corpus Linguistics), is increasingly a feature of the curriculum of Applied Linguistics and TESOL programmes. Philip Seargeant's book is aimed at master's-level students who are teachers in training or language professionals returning to study, and final year undergraduates. The first part of the book is what you would expect: everything applied linguistics students need to know about WES (World English Studies). The second part is a meditation on WES as academic discipline which is likely to provide food for thought for researchers as well as students. Fortunately the long tradition of undergraduate textbooks which offer region-by-region descriptions of English is on the wane. More recent textbooks such as Jenkins (2003) and Schneider (2011), and the more advanced Mesthrie and Bhatt (2008), whilst individually reflecting the preoccupations of their authors, all address the twin strands of World Englishes. These are, on the one hand, variation which has emerged over time through the dynamics of language contact, and on the other, the global character of English, which now sets it apart from the study of other languages. This, for Seargeant, is a paradox at the heart of WES: English is celebrated around the world for the way it can express the identity of particular communities (authenticity) but also for its universality and neutrality (anonymity).

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bao, Z. 2005. ‘The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation.’ Journal of Linguistics 41, 237–67.
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erling, E. J. & Seargeant, P. (eds) 2013. English and Development: Policy, Pedagogy and Globalization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Gut, U. 2007. ‘First language influence and final consonant clusters in the new Englishes of Singapore and Nigeria.’ World Englishes, 26(3), 346–59.
Jenkins, J. 2003. World Englishes: a Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge
Kachru, B. 1991. ‘Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern.’ English Today, 7(1), 313.
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pennycook, A. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. Abingdon: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Platt, J. T., Weber, H. & Ho, Mian Lian, 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Quirk, R. 1990. ‘Language varieties and standard language.English Today, 6(1), 310.
Robertson, R. 1995. ‘Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity.’ In Featherstone, M., Lash, S. & Robertson, R. (eds), Global Modernities. London: Sage, pp. 2544.
Schneider, E. W. 2011. English Around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharma, D. 2009. ‘Typological diversity in New Englishes.’ English World-Wide, 30(2), 170–95.

Authenticity versus autonomy: the synthesis of World Englishes as a discipline

  • Claire Cowie (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed