Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:59:34.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authenticity versus autonomy: the synthesis of World Englishes as a discipline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2014

Claire Cowie
Claire Cowie*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
claire.cowie@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

World Englishes, like other topics covered in the Routledge Introduction to Applied Linguistics series (ELT, Classroom Discourse, Corpus Linguistics), is increasingly a feature of the curriculum of Applied Linguistics and TESOL programmes. Philip Seargeant's book is aimed at master's-level students who are teachers in training or language professionals returning to study, and final year undergraduates. The first part of the book is what you would expect: everything applied linguistics students need to know about WES (World English Studies). The second part is a meditation on WES as academic discipline which is likely to provide food for thought for researchers as well as students. Fortunately the long tradition of undergraduate textbooks which offer region-by-region descriptions of English is on the wane. More recent textbooks such as Jenkins (2003) and Schneider (2011), and the more advanced Mesthrie and Bhatt (2008), whilst individually reflecting the preoccupations of their authors, all address the twin strands of World Englishes. These are, on the one hand, variation which has emerged over time through the dynamics of language contact, and on the other, the global character of English, which now sets it apart from the study of other languages. This, for Seargeant, is a paradox at the heart of WES: English is celebrated around the world for the way it can express the identity of particular communities (authenticity) but also for its universality and neutrality (anonymity).

Type
Review
Information
English Today , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 57 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Z. 2005. ‘The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation.’ Journal of Linguistics 41, 237–67.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erling, E. J. & Seargeant, P. (eds) 2013. English and Development: Policy, Pedagogy and Globalization. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. 2007. ‘First language influence and final consonant clusters in the new Englishes of Singapore and Nigeria.’ World Englishes, 26(3), 346–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. 2003. World Englishes: a Resource Book for Students. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. 1991. ‘Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern.’ English Today, 7(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R. M. 2008. World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, J. T., Weber, H. & Ho, Mian Lian, 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. 1990. ‘Language varieties and standard language.’ English Today, 6(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, R. 1995. ‘Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity.’ In Featherstone, M., Lash, S. & Robertson, R. (eds), Global Modernities. London: Sage, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. 2011. English Around the World: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. 2009. ‘Typological diversity in New Englishes.’ English World-Wide, 30(2), 170–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar