Skip to main content Accessibility help

Assessing proficiency in the National English Ability Test (NEAT) in South Korea: A critique of a government's approach to testing English proficiency

  • Hyejeong Ahn


The English language as a symbolic resource holds more notable cultural and social significance in South Korea than any other foreign language. In the current trend of globalisation, proficient English skills have been identified by the government as a critical resource for the country's survival, and developing these skills has been a major priority in all areas. A number of elite universities and sought-after conglomerates such as Samsung, LG and Hyundai have policies which noticeably favour and recruit students with high English proficiency levels (Lee, 2006: 67). In particular, scores achieved in the international proficiency tests such as the TOEIC (Test of English for International Communication) and TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language), in preference to scores gained in other English tests, have become a major determining factor in gaining employment and promotion. According to the Samsung Economic Research Institute between 2004 and 2005, 102,340 Koreans sat for TOEFL. Koreans represented 18.5% of the total 554,942 people taking the test worldwide and they spend 700 billion Won (approximately US$700 million) a year on tests to evaluate their English proficiency.



Hide All
Ahn, H. 2013. ‘English policy in South Korea: A role in attaining global competitiveness or a vehicle of social mobility?Journal of English as an International Language, 8(1), 120.
Ahn, H. 2014. ‘Teachers' attitudes towards Korean English in South Korea.’ World Englishes, 33(2), 195222.
Bolton, K. 2010. ‘Creativity and World Englishes.’ World Englishes, 29(4), 455–66.
Bolton, K., Graddol, D. & Meierkord, C. 2011. ‘Towards developmental world Englishes.’ World Englishes, 30(4), 459–80.
Canagarajah, S. 2006. ‘Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an International language.’ Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229–42.
Crystal, D. 2003. English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, A. 1996. ‘Proficiency or the native speaker: What are we trying to achieve in ELT?’ In Cook, G. & Seildhofer, B. (eds.), Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–58.
Davies, A. 2003. The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Firth, A. 1996. ‘The discursive accomplishment of normality: On conversation analysis and ‘lingua franca’ English.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–59.
Graddol, D. 2000. The Future of English. London: British Council.
Graddol, D. 2006. English Next: Why Global English May Mean the End of English as a Foreign Language. London: British Council.
Holliday, A. 2006. ‘Native Speakerism.’ ELT Journal, 60(1), 385–7.
Jenkins, J. 2006. ‘The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers.’ ELT Journal, 60(1), 142.
Jenkins, J. 2009. World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Jeon, H. C. 2006. ‘The economics of English.’ Economic report. Online at <> (Accessed October 15, 2013).
Jeong, Y. K. 2004. ‘A chapter of English teaching in Korea.’ English Today, 20(2), 40–6.
Jung, K. & Min, S. 1999. ‘Some lexico-grammatical features of Korean English newspapers.’ World Englishes, 18(1), 2337.
Kachru, B. B. (ed.) 1982. The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Kachru, B. B. 1996. ‘World Englishes: Agony and ecstasy.’ Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(2), 135–55.
KICE & MEST. 2011. National English ability test (NEAT) and the revisit of nationalwide enducation curriculum plan (NECP). Seoul: KICE.
Kirkpatrick, A. 2007. World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirkpatrick, A. 2008. ‘Learning English and other languages in multilingual settings.’ Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 31.33-31.11.
Kirkpatrick, A. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
Lawrence, C. B. 2010. ‘The verbal art of borrowing: Analysis of English borrowing in Korean pop songs.’ Asian Englishes, 13, 2243.
Lawrence, C. B. 2012. ‘The Korean English linguistic landscape.’ World Englishes, 31(1), 7092.
Lee, J. S. 2004. ‘Linguistic hybridization in K-Pop: Discourse of self-assertion and resistance.’ World Englishes, 23(3), 429–50.
Lee, J. S. 2006. ‘Linguistic constructions of modernity: English mixing in Korean television commercials.’ Language in Society, 35(1), 5991.
Lowenberg, P. 2012. ‘Assessing proficiency in EIL.’ In Matsuda, A. (Ed.), Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, pp. 7084.
Nunn, R. 2007. ‘Redefining communicative competence for international and local communities.’ Asian EFL, 9(4), 77110.
Park, J. 2009. ‘English fever in South Korea: Its history and symptoms.’ English Today, 25(1), 50–7.
Park, K. 2009. Characteristics of Korea English as a glocalised variety. In Murata, K. & Jenkins, J. (eds.), Global Englishes in Asian Contexts: Current and Future Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 94107.
Rohdenburg, G. & Schlüter, J. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars?: Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, E. 2003. ‘The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth.’ Language, 79(2), 233–81.
Seth, M. 2002. Education Fever: Society, Politics, and the Pursuit of Schooling in South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Sharifian, F. 2009. Cultural conceptualizations in English as an international languague. In Sharifian, F. (ed.), English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, pp. 242–53.
Sharifian, F. 2013. ‘Language and intercultural communication: From the old era to the new one.’ In Sharifian, F. & Jamarani, M. (eds.), Language and Intercultural Communication in the New Era. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 122.
Sharifian, F. & Clyne, M. 2008. ‘English as an international language: Challenges and possibilities.’ Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(3, special issue), 28.21–28.16.
Shim, R. J. 1994. ‘Englishized Korean: Structure, status, and attitudes.’ World Englishes, 13(2), 225–44.
Shim, R. J. 1999. ‘Codified Korean English: Process, characteristics and consequence.’ World Englishes, 18(2), 247–58.
Song, J. 2011. ‘English as an official Language in South Korea: Global English or social malady?Language Problems & Language Planning, 35(1), 3555.
Tottie, G. 2002. An Introduction to American English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Xu, Z. 2010. Chinese English: Features and Implications. Kowloon: Open University of Hong Kong Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Assessing proficiency in the National English Ability Test (NEAT) in South Korea: A critique of a government's approach to testing English proficiency

  • Hyejeong Ahn


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.