Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Failure of Expected-Utility Theory as a Theory of Reason

  • Jean Hampton (a1)


Expected-utility (EU) theory has been a popular and influential theory in philosophy, law, and the social sciences. While its original developers, von Neumann and Morgenstern, presented it as a purely predictive theory useful to the practitioners of economic science, many subsequent theorists, particularly those outside of economics, have come to endorse EU theory as providing us with a representation of reason. But precisely in what sense does EU theory portray reason? And does it do so successfully?

There are two strikingly different answers to these questions in the literature. On the one hand, there is the view of people such as David Gauthier that EU theory is an implementation of the idea that reason's only role is instrumental. On the other hand, there is the view suggested by Leonard Savage (1954/1972; and see Anderson, 1993) that the theory is a “formal” and noninstrumental characterization of our reasoning process.



Hide All
Allais, Maurice. 1953. “Le comportement de L'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axioms de l'ecole Americaine.” Econometrica 21:503–46.
Allais, Maurice. 1979a. “The So-Called Allais Paradox and Rational Decision under Uncertainty.” In Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox, edited by Allais, M. and Hagen, O., pp. 437681. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Arrow, Kenneth. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.
Baumol, William. 1972. Economic Theory and Operations Analysis. Third ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bentham, Jeremy. [1823] 1982. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, 1982 edition edited by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.. London: Methuen.
Bergstrom, Lars. 1966. The Consequences of Action. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Bernoulli, Daniel. 1738. “Exposition of a New Theory of Measurement of Risk.” Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5, transl. Louise Sommer, in Econometrica 22 (1954):23–36. Reprinted in Utility Theory: A Book of Readings, edited by Alfred N. Page, pp. 199–214. London: Wiley, 1968.
Broome, John. 1991a. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Blackwell.
Broome, John. 1991b. “Rationality and the Sure Thing Principle.” In Thoughtful Economic Man: Essays on Rationality, Moral Rules and Benevolence, edited by Meeks, Gay, pp. 74102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broome, John. 1993. “Can a Humean be Moderate?” In Value, Welfare and Morality, edited by Frey, R. G. and Morris, Christopher, pp. 5173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brink, David. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cooter, Robert, and Rappoport, Peter. 1984. “Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics?Journal of Economic Literature XXII(2):507–30.
Diamond, Peter. 1967. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 75:765–66.
Dreier, James. 1993. “Structures of Normative Theories.” The Monist 76(1):2240.
Dreier, James., Forthcoming. “Perspectives on the Normativity of Morality.” Nous.
Ellsberg, Daniel. 1954. “Classic and Current Notions of ‘Measurable Utility.’Economic Journal LXIV:528–56.
Fishbum, Peter. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision-Making. New York: Wiley.
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hammond, Peter. 1988a. “Consequentialism and the Independence Axiom.” In Risk, Decision and Rationality, edited by Munier, B. R.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Hammond, Peter. 1988b. “Consequentialist Foundations for Expected Utility Theory.” Theory and Decision 25:2578.
Hampton, Jean. 1990. “Hobbes's Science of Moral Philosophy.” In Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies in the Relationship Between Epistemology and Political Philosophy, edited by Dascal, Marcelo and Gruengard, Ora. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Hampton, Jean. Forthcoming. “On Instrumental Rationality.” In Essays in Honor of Kurt Baier, edited by J. Schneewind. Peru, IL: Open Court.
Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford
Hume, David. 1888. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. edition, revised P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurley, Susan. 1989. Natural Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jeffrey, Richard. 1965/1983. The Logic of Decision. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jeffrey, Richard. 1971. “On Interpersonal Utility Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 68.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1990. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” In The Limits of Rationality, edited by Cook, Karen and Levi, Margaret, pp. 6089. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kreps, David. 1988. Notes on a Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO: Westvievv Press.
Little, M. D. 1984. “Comment.” Journal of Economic Literature XXII(2):1187.
Loomes, Graham, and Sugden, Robert. 1982. “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty.” Economic Journal 92:805–24.
Loomes, Graham, and Sugden, Robert. 1984. “The Importance of What Might Have Been.” In Progress in Utility and Risk Theory, edited by Hagen, Ole and Westop, Fred, pp. 219–35. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Luce, R. Duncan, and Raiffa, Howard. 1957/1985. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Dover.
Machina, Mark. 1981. “Rational Decision Making Versus ‘Rational’ Decision Modelling.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 24:163–75.
Machina, Mark. 1991. “Dynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty.” In Foundations of Decision Theory: Issues and Advances, edited by Bacharach, Michael and Hurley, Susan. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin.
Macrimmon, Kenneth, and Larrson, Stig. 1979. “Utility Theory: Axioms Versus Paradoxes.” In Expected Utility Theory and the Allais Paradox, edited by Allais, M. and Hagen, Ole, pp. 333409. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Manne, Alan E. 1952. “The Strong Independence Assumption - Gasoline Blends and Probability Mixture.” Econometrica 20:665–68.
Marshall, Alfred. 1925. Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan.
McClennen, Edward. 1990. Rationality and Dynamic Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nelson, Alan. 1990. “Are Economic Kinds Natural?Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14:102–35.
von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar. 1944/1947/1953. Theory of Games and Economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nozick, Robert. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ramsey, Frank. 1931. “Truth and Probability.” In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, edited by Braithwaite, R. B.. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. The same essay exists in modified form in Frank Ramsey, Foundations, edited by D. H. Mellor. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.
Samuelson, Paul. 1952. “Probability, Utility and the Independence Axiom.” Econometrica 20(4):670–78.
Samuelson, Paul. 1966. “Utility, Preferences and Probability.” In Collected Scientific Papers. Volume I, edited by Stiglitz, Joseph, pp. 127–36. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Satz, Debra, and Ferejohn, John. 1994. “Rational Choice and Social Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 91(2):7187.
Savage, Leonard. 1954/1972. The Foundations of Statistics. Original edition, New York: Wiley and Sons. Revised edition, New York: Dover.
Sen, Amartya. 1977. “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6:317–44.
Sen, Amartya. 1983. “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12:113–32.
Sen, Amartya. 1985. “Rationality and Uncertainty.” Theory and Decision 19:109–28
Smart, J. J. C. 1973. In Utilitarianism For and Against (with Bernard Williams). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, George, and Becker, Gary. 1990. “De Gustibus Non Disputandum.” In The Limits of Rationality, edited by Cook, Karen and Levi, Margaret, pp. 191221. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sugden, Robert. 1991. “Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy.” Economic Journal 101(407):751–85.
Taylor, Charles. 1982. “The Diversity of Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, A. and Williams, B., pp. 129–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, Amos. 1967. “Additivity, Utility and Subjective Probability.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 4(2):175201.
Tversky, Amos. 1975. “A Critique of Expected Utility Theory: Descriptive and Normative Considerations.” Erkenntnis 9:163–73.
Vallentyne, Peter. 1988. “Teleology, Consequentialism and the Past.” Journal of Value Inquiry 22:89101.
Weymark, John. 1991. “A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi-Sen Debate on Utilitarianism.” In Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, edited by Elster, Jon and Roemer, John, pp. 255320. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, Bernard. 1981. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Moral Luck, pp. 101–13. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

The Failure of Expected-Utility Theory as a Theory of Reason

  • Jean Hampton (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.