Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The epistemic division of labour in markets: knowledge, global trade and the preconditions of morally responsible agency

  • Lisa Herzog (a1)

Abstract

Markets allow for the processing of decentralized information through the price mechanism. But in addition, many markets rely on other mechanisms in markets, or non-market institutions, that provide and manage other forms of knowledge. Within national economies, these institutions form an ‘epistemic infrastructure’ for markets. In global markets, in contrast, this epistemic infrastructure is very patchy, undermining the preconditions for morally responsible agency. New technologies might help to improve the epistemic infrastructure of global markets, but they require conceptualizing knowledge not only as a tradable good, but also as a precondition of morally responsible agency.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Akerlof, G.A. 1970. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488500.
Anderson, E. 2012. Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology 26, 163173.
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1963. Intention (2nd edn). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Appiah, A.K. 2011. The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Barry, C. and Reddy, S. 2008. International Trade and Labour Standards: A Proposal for Linkage. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Çalışkan, K. 2010. Market Threads. How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create a Global Commodity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Calvert-Minor, C. 2011. ‘Epistemological communities’ and the problem of epistemic agency. Social Epistemology 25, 341360.
Collins, S. 2013. Collectives’ duties and collectivization duties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91, 231248.
Collins, S. and Lawford-Smith, H. 2016. The transfer of duties: from individuals to states and back again. In The Epistemic Life of Groups, ed. Brady, M. and Fricker, M., 150172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Bruin, B. 2015. Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis: Why Incompetence is Worse than Greed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diekmann, A. and Przepiorka, W. 2018. Trust and reputation in markets. In The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation, ed. Giardini, F. and Wittek, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
George, D. 2001. Preference Pollution. How Markets Create the Desires We Dislike. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Goff, S.C. 2018. Fair trade: global problems and individual responsibilities. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21, 521–5 43.
Goldberg, S.C. 2015. Should have known. Synthese 194, 28632894.
Goldman, A.I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481510.
The Guardian 2014. This cry for help on a Primark label can’t be ignored. 25 June, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/25/primark-label-swansea-textile-industry-rana-plaza.
von Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, 519530.
Herzog, L. 2016. Who should prevent sweatshops? Duties, excuses, and the moral division of labour in the global economy. In Die Philosophie des Marktes [The Philosophy of the Market] Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie 7, ed. Schmidt am Busch, H.-Chr., 255278. Hamburg: Meiner.
Herzog, L. and Walton, A. 2014. Qualified market access and interdisciplinarity (research note). Ethics & Global Politics 7, 8394.
Jones, T. 2007. Numerous ways to be an open-minded organization: a reply to Lahroodi. Social Epistemology 21, 439448.
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kreps, D.M. 1990. Cooperate culture and economic theory. In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, ed. Alt, J. and Shepsle, K., 90143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kutz, C. 2000. Complicity. Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lahroodi, R. 2007. Collective epistemic virtues. Social Epistemology 21, 281297.
List, C. and Pettit, P. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, D.A. 2008. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organizations 36, 379415.
Sher, G. 2009. Who Knew? Responsibility without Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siamwalla, A. 1978. Farmers and middlemen: aspects of agricultural marketing in Thailand. Economic Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific 29, 3850.
Smith, H. 1983. Culpable ignorance. Philosophical Review 92, 543571.
Smith, H. 2014. The subjective moral duty to inform oneself before acting. Ethics 125, 1138.
Spillman, L. 2012. Solidarity in Strategy. Making Business Meaningful in American Trade Associations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Srivastava, M. and Shannon, S. 2013. Ninety cents buys safety on $22 jeans in Bangladesh, 2013. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-05/ninety-cents-buys-safety-on-22-jeans-in-bangladesh.html.
Stedman Jones, D. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Toffler, A. 1970. Future Shock. New York, NY: Random House.
Van Horn, R., Mirowski, P. and Stapleford, T.A., eds 2011. Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America’s Most Powerful Economics Program. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts, S. and Wyner, G. 2011. Designing and theorizing the adoption of mobile technology-mediated ethical consumption tools. Information Technology & People 24, 257280.
Young, I.M. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keywords

The epistemic division of labour in markets: knowledge, global trade and the preconditions of morally responsible agency

  • Lisa Herzog (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed