Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T12:05:36.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Asymptotic Local Structure of the Cox Modified Likelihood-Ratio Statistic for Testing Non-Nested Hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2010

Jerzy Szroeter
Jerzy Szroeter
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that the Cox modified likelihood-ratio statistic for testing partially non-nested hypotheses H0 and H1 is asymptotically equivalent to a bilinear form in nondegenerate asymptotically normal random vectors for sequences of data-generating processes converging to the intersection of H0 and H1 but not necessarily belonging to either H0 or H1. One of the asymptotically normal vectors is the complete parametric encompassing vector of Mizon and Richard, while the other is a close relative. The results are valid regardless of whether or not the data-generating process is exponential and imply that the Cox statistic is not generally asymptotically locally normal. This corrects an assumption made in recent literature.

Type
Articles
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 553 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cox, D.R.Tests of separate families of hypotheses. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1 (1961): 105–123.Google Scholar
2.Cox, D.R.Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 24 (1962): 406–424.Google Scholar
3.Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J.G.. Some non-nested hypothesis tests and the relations among them. Review of Economic Studies 49 (1982): 551–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J.G.. The interpretation of test statistics. Canadian Journal of Economics 18 (1985): 38–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Davidson, R. & MacKinnon, J.G.. Implicit alternatives and the local power of test statistics. Econometrica 55 (1987): 1305–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Godfrey, L.G. & Pesaran, M.H.. Tests of non-nested regression models: Small-sample adjustments and Monte Carlo evidence. Journal of Econometrics 21 (1983): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A. & Trognon, A.. Testing nested or non-nested hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics 21 (1983): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A. & Trognon, A.. Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Theory. Econometrica 52 (1984): 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Hausman, J.Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46 (1978): 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kent, J.T.The underlying structure of non-nested hypothesis tests. Biometrika 73 (1988): 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.McAleer, M. Specification tests for separate models: A survey. In King, M.L. & Giles, D.E.A. (eds.), Specification Analysis in the Linear Model, Chapter 9 and pp. 146–196. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987.Google Scholar
12.Mizon, G.E. The encompassing approach in econometrics. In Hendry, D.F. & Wallis, K.F. (eds.), Econometrics and Quantitative Economics, Chapter 6 and pp. 135–172. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
13.Mizon, G.E., & Richard, J.-F.. The encompassing principle and its application to non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 54 (1986): 657–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Pesaran, M.H.Global and partial non-nested hypotheses and asymptotic local power. Econometric Theory 3 (1987): 67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Vuong, Q.H.Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57 (1989): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.White, H.Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50 (1982): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.White, H.Regularity conditions for Cox's test of non-nested hypotheses. Journal of Econometrics 19 (1982): 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar