Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:51:52.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Morality and Religion in the Family Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2014

James Munby
James Munby*
Affiliation:
President, Family Division of the High Court
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The link between law and morality has been hotly debated by lawyers and philosophers over the years. This article takes as its starting point the assumption at the beginning of the twentieth century that it was the responsibility of courts and their judges to enforce and promote Christian morality. During the course of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries that assumption has been comprehensively undone. This article examines the key points in the development of judicial approaches to law, morality and religion that have led to a completely different approach to such questions in the courts today.

Keywords

family lawjudgesmoralityreligious belief
Type
Articles
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , May 2014 , pp. 131 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Constantinidi v Constantinidi and Lance [1905] P 253 at 278, per Stirling LJ.

3 Upfill v Wright [1911] 1 KB 506.

4 Ibid, at 510.

5 That is, a claim under s 14 of the Trustees of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.

6 Heglibiston Establishment v Heyman (1977) 36 P&CR 351.

7 In re Besant (1878) 11 ChD 508. See R v Bradlaugh (Charles) and Besant (Annie) (1877) 2 QBD 569, (1878) 3 QB 607.

8 Seddon v Seddon and Doyle (1862) 2 Sw&Tr 640, at 641, 642.

9 Mill, J S, ‘On liberty’, in Three Essays (Oxford, 1975)Google Scholar, p 15.

10 Stephen, J, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (London, 1873)Google Scholar, pp 150, 152.

11 Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (Cmnd 247, 1958), paras 13–14.

12 HL Deb 4 December 1957, vol 206, cols 810–811.

13 Devlin, P, The Enforcement of Morals (Oxford, 1965) pp 13–14Google Scholar, 15, 17.

14 Hart, H, Law, Liberty and Morality (Oxford, 1963)Google Scholar, p 10.

15 Shaw v Director of Public Prosecutions [1962] AC 220, at 267.

16 Hart, H, The Morality of the Criminal Law (Oxford, 1964), pp 39–41Google Scholar.

17 [1917] AC 406.

18 Purchas LJ in Re R (A Minor) (Residence: Religion) [1993] 2 FLR 163, at 171; Scarman LJ in Re T (Minors) (Custody: Religious Upbringing) (1981) 2 FLR 239, at 244; Latey J in Re B and G (Minors) (Custody) [1985] FLR 134, at 157, referring to scientology.

19 Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom (No 2) App No 7511/76 (ECtHR, 25 February 1982), at para 36.

20 Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v Russia, App No 72881/01 (ECtHR, 5 October 2006), at para 58.

21 Westminster City Council v C and Others [2008] EWCA Civ 198, [2009] Fam 11.

22 Re T (Minors) (Custody: Religious Upbringing) (1981) 2 FLR 239 at 244–245.